Table 2.
Comparison of the presented clipping based transmitter oriented PAPR reduction methods for FBMC signals.
| PAPR reduction technique | Transmitter complexity | Data rate loss | Constellation distortion | Power increase | Receiver requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clipping and filtering | Low | No | Yes | No | Receiver requires clipping noise mitigation [13, 17] |
| TR | Moderate | Yes | No | Yes | Subcarrier indexes used for TR (N R) are required |
| ACE | High | No | Yes | Yes | Soft decision making is not possible |
| TRACE | High | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same as for TR and ACE |