Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 16;2014:629791. doi: 10.1155/2014/629791

Table 2.

Estimated home range areas (km2) for empirically observed red grouper, black grouper, and mutton snapper compared to home range areas from simulated detection patterns and actual paths for simulated fish, with difference between simulated and simulated detection home range sizes.

Species Stat Minimum convex polygon (MCP), home range (km2) Kernel density (95% KD), home range (km2)
Observed Simulated Simulated detections Simulated-simulated detections Observed Simulated Simulated detections Simulated-simulated detections
Red grouper Mean 2.09 2.28 2.49 −0.19 1.71 3.60 7.72 −4.12
sd 2.04 0.81 1.58 1.85 0.48 0.89 4.69 4.75
n 29 32 30 30 29 32 29 29
se 0.38 0.14 0.29 0.34 0.09 0.16 0.87 0.88

Black grouper Mean 1.44 2.06 1.84 0.34 0.24 3.93 7.16 −3.42
sd 1.48 0.84 1.33 1.65 0.12 1.22 4.70 4.79
n 2 32 30 32 2 32 29 29
se 1.05 0.15 0.24 0.29 0.08 0.22 0.87 0.89

Mutton snapper Mean 7.64 7.72 5.55 2.17 0.58 6.16 8.01 −1.85
sd 2.23 3.06 3.67 1.11 3.80 4.14
n 1 32 32 32 1 32 32 32
se 0.39 0.54 0.65 0.20 0.67 0.73