Table 2.
Estimated home range areas (km2) for empirically observed red grouper, black grouper, and mutton snapper compared to home range areas from simulated detection patterns and actual paths for simulated fish, with difference between simulated and simulated detection home range sizes.
| Species | Stat | Minimum convex polygon (MCP), home range (km2) | Kernel density (95% KD), home range (km2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Simulated | Simulated detections | Simulated-simulated detections | Observed | Simulated | Simulated detections | Simulated-simulated detections | ||
| Red grouper | Mean | 2.09 | 2.28 | 2.49 | −0.19 | 1.71 | 3.60 | 7.72 | −4.12 |
| sd | 2.04 | 0.81 | 1.58 | 1.85 | 0.48 | 0.89 | 4.69 | 4.75 | |
| n | 29 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 29 | 32 | 29 | 29 | |
| se | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.87 | 0.88 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Black grouper | Mean | 1.44 | 2.06 | 1.84 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 3.93 | 7.16 | −3.42 |
| sd | 1.48 | 0.84 | 1.33 | 1.65 | 0.12 | 1.22 | 4.70 | 4.79 | |
| n | 2 | 32 | 30 | 32 | 2 | 32 | 29 | 29 | |
| se | 1.05 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.87 | 0.89 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Mutton snapper | Mean | 7.64 | 7.72 | 5.55 | 2.17 | 0.58 | 6.16 | 8.01 | −1.85 |
| sd | — | 2.23 | 3.06 | 3.67 | — | 1.11 | 3.80 | 4.14 | |
| n | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| se | — | 0.39 | 0.54 | 0.65 | — | 0.20 | 0.67 | 0.73 | |