Table 1.
Nine Annotated Novel AFLP Fragments Affected by Either Hybridization or Polyploidization
| Fragment Size (bp) | Fragment Display Pattern |
Sequence Similaritya | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. m | Hy | Am | L. p | ||
| 189 | − | + | + | − | Ricinus communis hypothetical protein, mRNA |
| 122 | − | + | − | − | Acrossocheilus monticola microsatellite sequence |
| 124 | +b | + | − | +b | Helianthus annuus NBS-LRR resistance-like protein |
| 188 | +b | − | + | +b | Linum usitatissimum microsatellite sequence |
| 173 | − | − | + | − | Linum usitatissimum microsatellite sequence |
| 92c | +b | + | − | +b | Linum usitatissimum microsatellite sequence |
| 125 | − | − | + | − | PREDICTED: Strongylocentrotus purpuratus uncharacterized, mRNA |
| 211 | +b | + | − | +b | Linum usitatissimum microsatellite sequence |
| 188 | +b | − | + | +b | Linum usitatissimum microsatellite sequence |
Note.—C. m, C. morifolium; Hy, amphihaploid; Am, amphidiploid; L. p, L. paludosum; +, parental fragment present; –, parental fragment absent. Detailed information displayed in supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online.
aBlastN or BlastX threshold E values <0.05.
bNonparental fragments.
cAppeared twice in different amphihaploid lines.