Table 1. Trap spacing (km) for each combination of trap configuration (regular, clustered, and sequential) and number of traps (J = 128, 96, 64, and 32).

	Number of traps, J
	128	96	64		32
Regular	4.71	5.24	6.4		9.6
Clustered	9.06	9.06	9.06		N/A
Sequential	9.06	9.06	9.06	9.06

Trap spacing (km) in the regular trap configuration was varied by decreasing the number of traps in the study area. Trap spacing did not vary when traps were in the clustered or sequential configurations because reductions only decreased the number of traps per cluster.