Table 2. Effective trap spacings for each σ, scaled by dividing trap spacings (4.71, 5.24, 6.40, and 9.60 km) by σ (1, 5, 10 km).

	σ = 1 km						σ = 5 km				σ = 10 km
	Trap spacing (km)						Trap spacing (km)				Trap spacing (km)
	4.71		5.24		6.40	9.60	4.71	5.24	6.40	9.60	4.71	5.24	6.40	9.60
Regular	4.71		5.24		6.40	9.60	0.94	1.05	1.28	1.92	0.47	0.52	0.64	0.96
Clustered	9.06	9.06		9.06		N/A	1.81	1.81	1.81	N/A	0.91	0.91	0.91	N/A
Sequential	9.06	9.06		9.06		9.06	1.81	1.81	1.81	1.81	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.91

For example, a trap spacing of 4.71 km equals 4.71σ when σ = 1 km but only 0.47σ when σ = 10 km.

Trap spacing of 9.60 km was not evaluated for the clustered trap configuration because it employs J = 32 traps and therefore is equivalent to the regular trap spacing.