Table 1. qPCR versus Microarray results correlations and primers used.

Genes	Pearson (r)	Statistics	Foward	Reverse
Il6	0,91	p = 0,001	5′-GTTCTCTGGGAAATCGTGGA-3′	5′-TGTACTCCAGGTAGCTATGG-3′
Il12a	0,89	p = 0,001	5′-GATCATGAAGACATCACACGG-3′	5′-AGAATGATCTGCTGATGGTGG-3′
Il10	0,84	p = 0,01	5′-TCAAACAAAGGACCAGCTGGACAACATACTG-3′	5′-CTGTCTAGGTCCTGGAGTCCAGCAGACTCAA-3′
Il1b	0,81	p = 0,01	5′-CAGTTCTGCCATTGACCATC-3′	5′-TCTCACTGAAACTCAGCCGT-3′
Tnfa	0,82	p = 0,01	5′-TCTCATCAGTTCTATGGCCC-3′	5′-GGGAGTAGACAAGGTACAAC-3′
Csf2	0,80	p = 0,01	5′-TGAACCTCCTGGATGACATG-3′	5′-GTGTTTCACAGTCCGTTTCC-3′
Cxcl1	0.89	p = 0,001	5′- TGAAGCTCCCTTGGTTCAGA-3′	5′- AGGTGCCATCAGAGCAGTCT-3′
Msr1	0.91	p = 0,001	5′- GGGGAGTGTAGGCGGATCAACCCC-3′	5′- CGGCCCTCATGGGCTCCACTA-3′
Hmox1	0.87	p = 0,001	5′- ACCAGAGTCCCTCACAGATGGCG-3′	5′- GCAGGGGCAGTATCTTGCACCA-3′
β2microglubulin	0.97	p = 0,001	5′TGACCGGCTTGTATGCTATC-3′	5′-CAGTGTGAGCCAGGATATAG-3′

Relative differences were calculated according to the delta-delta Ct method. Microarray data was correlated with qPCR results using Pearson’s analyses and the same four samples on each line.