Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 28;110(3):668–678. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.727

Table 2. Staining intensities of potential demethylating proteins and DNA methylases observed in CIS by immunohistochemistry.

Antigen Nucleus Cytoplasm
TET1 N=6
neg, few +
neg, few +
TET2 N=6
neg, few +
neg, few +
APOBEC1 N=8
neg, +
+++
MBD4 N=8
+, ++, few neg
neg
APEX1 N=8
++, +++, few neg
neg
PARP1 N=8
+, ++, few neg, few +++
neg
DNMT1 N=8
+, ++, few neg
neg
DNMT3A N=8
neg
neg
DNMT3B N=8
neg, few +
neg
DNMT3L N=8 neg and ++ neg

For each tissue sample, the intensity of the staining of CIS cells, was evaluated and scored as negative (neg), faint staining (+), moderate staining (++) and strong staining (+++). For each antigen, the general staining pattern observed across the investigated tissue samples was subsequently summarised, by collectively describing all the staining intensities observed in the included samples (N). If a staining intensity was observed only in a few (1–2) of the included tissue samples, this was noted (few).