Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 19;2014:595208. doi: 10.1155/2014/595208

Table 4.

The two clusters of activities associated with sleep disturbances, with and without adjustment for confounders.

Model 1a Model 1b
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Physical outdoor activities 0.007
 None 2.15 0.92–5.01 0.077
 One 1.80 0.81–3.96 0.148
 Two 1.70 0.80–3.61 0.168
 Three 1.06 0.51–2.20 0.881
 Four 0.80 0.39–1.65 0.546
Sociointellectual activities <0.001
 None 3.75 1.49–9.43 0.005
 One 3.15 1.26–7.88 0.014
 Two 1.92 0.76–4.88 0.170
 Three 0.69 0.24–2.02 0.497
Gender (women) 3.12 2.16–4.52 <0.001
Age cohorts 0.011
 72- and 78-year-olds 0.93 0.60–1.44 0.742
 81 years or older 1.68 1.09–2.58 0.018
General health <0.001
 Good 3.36 2.00–5.62 <0.001
 Poor/fair 6.97 4.24–11.45 <0.001

Notes: in model 1a physical outdoor activities and sociointellectual activities were entered. The model explained between 8.9% (Cox and Snell R 2) and 13.2% (Nagelkerke R 2), Hosmer and Lemeshow 0.662, chi-square 5.870 (df 8), missing n = 85. Model 1b included physical outdoor activities and sociointellectual activities and was adjusted for gender, age, functional ability, mood, and general health. The model explained between 16.1% (Cox and Snell R 2) and 23.8% (Nagelkerke R 2), Hosmer and Lemeshow 0.497, chi-square 7.377 (df 8), missing n = 111. Significant factors are presented in bold. Only the last step of the regression analyses is shown in the table.