Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(7):521–538. doi: 10.2165/11535210-000000000-00000

Table 2.

Summary of Cost-effectiveness Studies Comparing Anticoagulants with Aspirin

Study ID Comparator #1 Aspirin regimen Horizon Major Bleeding rate (%) Anticoagulant / ASA DVT rate (%) Anticoagulant rate / ASA PE rate (%) Anticoagulant / ASA Death Rate (%) Anticoagulant / ASA Cost-Effectiveness Result Reported by Study Authors, converted to 2009 USD*
THR Results from Short Horizon Analysis
Sarasin 2002 Enoxaparin 40 mg qd × 10 days 300 mg qd × 10 days 90 days 0.49 / 0.48 5.59 / 8.79 1.12 / 1.76 ns /ns LMWH ICER = $1300 / VTE avoided
Abdool-Carrim 1997 Enoxaparin 40 mg or Dalteparin 4,000-5,000 IUs qd × 28 days post-discharge 160 mg qd × 28 days post-discharge ns 2.00 / 0.70 21.0 / 35.0 ns / ns 1.10 / 1.50 LMWH ICER = $7200 / VTE avoided
Sarasin 2002 Warfarin dose not specified × 28 days post-discharge 160 mg qd × 28 days post-discharge 90 days 0.59 / 0.48 6.52 / 8.79 1.30 / 1.76 ns /ns Warfarin ICER = $1700 / VTE avoided

Abbreviations: LMWH = low molecular weight heparin, ns = not specified, VTE = venous thromboembolism, QALY = quality adjusted life-year

*

Cost-effectiveness result is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). To arrive at ICER values, incremental costs reported in foreign currencies were inflated or deflated according to readily available consumer price indices, converted to USD via 2005 World Health Organization purchasing price parity indices, and then inflated to 2009 USD using the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price calculator available at www.bls.gov.

DVT rate not specified (i.e. clinical vs. radiographic and proximal vs distal)