Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 22;472(3):968–975. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3346-3

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Location Years Study design Diagnosis Spinal levels Surgery Number of patients Mean age (years) NOS score Level of evidence
Obese Nonobese Obese Nonobese Combined
Ain et al. [1] USA 1970–2003 Retrospective SS L Laminectomy 32 17 39 8 II
Andreshak et al. [2] USA NR Prospective SS, LDH L Laminectomy, discectomy, fusion 55 95 47.9 46.8 5 I
Djurasovic et al. [5] USA 2001–2005 Retrospective SS, LDH L Fusion 109 161 56.2 57.1 8 II
Fang et al. [6] USA 1991–1997 Retrospective SS, AIS C, T, L Laminectomy, discectomy, fusion 47 92 42.5 5 III
Friedman et al. [8] USA 1991–2001 Prospective DD C, T, L Laminectomy 40 83 51.6 5 III
Gepstein et al. [9] Israel 1990–2000 Prospective LDH L Laminectomy, discectomy 67 231 69.6 71.9 8 I
Gu et al. [10] China 2010–2011 Retrospective SS L Fusion 7 50 57 60.3 8 II
Gu et al. [11] China 1997–2000 Retrospective LDH L Discectomy 80 368 45.4 7 II
Hanigan et al. [13] USA 1984–1984 Prospective LDH L Discectomy 17 88 42.7 40.4 8 I
Hardesty et al. [14] USA 1998–2010 Retrospective AIS T, L Fusion, segmental instrumentation 55 181 14 14.5 8 II
Kalanithi et al.[15] USA 2003–2007 Retrospective DD C, L Fusion 1455 83,152 NR NR 8 III
Knutsson et al. [16] Sweden 2006–2008 Prospective SS L Fusion 606 2027 67 69.4 8 II
Koutsoumbelis et al. [17] USA 2000–2006 Retrospective NR L Posterior fusion 48 204 58.3 5 III
Maragakis et al. [19] USA 2001–2004 Retrospective NR L, S Laminectomy, fusion 64 144 55 5 III
Mehta et al. [20] USA 2006–2008 Retrospective NR L Fusion 122 176 59.7 5 II
Meredith et al. [21] USA 2005–2008 Retrospective LDH L Microdiscectomy 25 75 46 6 II
Olsen et al. [22] USA 1996–1999 Retrospective NR C, T, L, S Laminectomy, fusion 66 151 53.1 5 III
Olsen et al. [23] USA 1998–2002 Retrospective DD C, T, L, S Laminectomy, discectomy, fusion 92 181 52.4 5 III
O’Neill et al. [24] USA 1991–2001 Retrospective AIS T, L Boston or custom-molded orthosis 31 245 22.8 6 II
Park et al. [25] USA 2006–2007 Retrospective SS L Laminectomy, discectomy, fusion 56 21 54.1 43.7 7 II
Patel et al. [26] USA 2002–2005 Retrospective DD T, L Fusion 39 50 58.8 6 II
Peng et al. [27] USA 2007–2008 Prospective SS, LDH L Fusion 33 41 47.3 44.7 8 III
Pull ter Gunne & Cohen [28] USA 1996–2005 Retrospective DD C, T, L, S Laminectomy, discectomy, fusion 235 2939 55.6 5 II
Rao et al. [30] USA Jan. 2008– Dec 2008 Retrospective DD, trauma C, T, L Fusion 101 137 56 5 III
Rihn et al. [31] USA 2000–2005 Retrospective DS, LSS L Laminectomy 328 482 62.9 66.8 8 II
Rihn et al. [32] USA 2000–2005 Retrospective LDH L Discectomy 336 854 NR NR 8 II
Rodgers et al. [33] USA 2006–2008 Retrospective DD T, L Extreme lateral interbody fusion 156 157 58.9 62.9 8 II
Rosen et al. [34] USA 2002–2006 Prospective DD L Fusion 35 72 56 8 I
Senker et al. [35] Austria 2010–2011 Retrospective DD L Fusion, laminotomy 27 45 61.8 8 II
Tomasino et al. [39] USA 2004–2007 Retrospective SS, LDH L Laminectomy, discectomy 36 79 47.4 51.3 8 II
Upasani et al. [40] USA 1995–2004 Retrospective AIS C, T, L, S Fusion, thoracotomy 48 193 14.3 8 II
Yadla et al. [43] USA May 2008– Dec 2008 Prospective DD, trauma T, L Laminectomy, discectomy, fusion 45 42 52.8 6 I

NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa scale; C = cervical; T: thoracic; L = lumbar; S: = sacral; DD = degenerative disease; SS = Spinal stenosis; DS = degenerative spondylolisthesis; LDH = lumbar disc herniation; AIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; NR = not reported.