Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 5;472(3):1001–1009. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3319-6

Table 3.

Comparison of Salter and Pemberton groups

Clinical and radiographic findings Salter osteotomy (95% CI) Pemberton acetabuloplasty (95% CI) p value
Symptoms (pain, soreness, discomfort of surgically treated hip) 1/14 (7%) 3/28 (11%) 1.000
Relative risk ratio, 0.67 (0.08, 5.84)
Anterior impingement sign 0/14 (0%) 3/28 (11%) 0.539
Relative risk ratio, 0
VCA angle (degrees)* 44 (37.14, 50.98) 43 (37.65, 48.11) 0.885
AAHI (%)* 86 (81.49, 90.84) 86 (82.44, 88.82) 0.906
WAI (degrees)* 12 (9.26, 15.07) 6 (4.84, 7.16) 0.001
VCA angle ratio* 1.06 (0.92, 1.21) 1.00 (0.91, 1.09) 0.609
AAHI ratio* 0.98 (0.93, 1.02) 0.97 (0.94, 1.00) 0.932
WAI ratio* 0.94 (0.70, 1.17) 0.53 (0.40, 0.65) < 0.001
Kalamchi classification
 No avascular necrosis 0 5
 Group I 3 3
 Group II 7 13
 Group III 4 7
 Group IV 0 0
Harris hip score* 99 (97.77, 99.94) 99 (99.08, 100.06) 0.362
SF-36* 83 (76.54, 89.03) 85 (80.86, 89.07) 0.468
SF-36 (physical health dimension)* 82 (75.81, 88.34) 87 (83.23, 90.62) 0.198
SF-36 (mental health dimension)* 78 (70.39, 85.32) 79 (73.77, 84.38) 0.742

* Mann-Whitney test; Fisher’s exact test; VCA angle = vertical-center- anterior margin angle; AAHI = anterior acetabular head index; WAI = weightbearing zone acetabular index; relative risk ratio of all parameters is the value of the surgically treated side divided by that of the nonoperated side.