Methods | Country: USA Recruitment: Hygiene patients in private dental practices Cluster randomized trial |
|
Participants | 633 ST users >= 15 years of age | |
Interventions | 1. Intervention: Determine tobacco use, identify oral disease, strong advice to quit, set quit date within 2w, motivation video, written material, call patient within 2w. 2. Usual care | |
Outcomes | 12m 'sustained' abstinence from ST and all tobacco: subjects must have reported 7‐day PP ST and all tobacco abstinence at both 3m and 12m. Abstinence verification: None | |
Notes | Data for smokers in the same trial reported in Severson 1998 ICC calculated < 0.0009. Intervention group more likely to have previously been advised by a dental care provider to quit use of ST and were less likely to be single. Study reports only those using smokeless tobacco. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Cluster randomized: Practices were blocked (by average number of hygiene visits per week and years dentists had been in practice). Method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | At hygiene visit all patients completed health survey; those responding 'Yes' to current use of tobacco were enrolled. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Loss to follow‐up was 26% (102/394) in intervention and 26% (62/239) in the control group. |