Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 2;1(6):883–888. doi: 10.3892/br.2013.163

Table IV.

Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for carriers of rs2230806.

Alleles

Metabolic profile AA AG GG A G
Controls, TG (mmol/l)
 Normal (%) 30 (30) 17 (17) 10 (10) 0.385 0.185
 High (%) 23 (23) 18 (18) 2 (2) 0.32 0.11
Patients, TG (mmol/l)
 Normal 32 (26.6) 51 (42.5) 9 (0.075) 0.479 0.287
 High 17 (14.1) 11 (9.1) 0.187 0.045
OR of GG genotypes vs AA+AG, (95% CI), P-value 2.362 (0.9055–6.161), 0.08
Controls, TC (mmol/l)
 Normal (%) 14 (14) 35 (35) 26 (26) 0.216 0.381
 High (%) 8 (8) 9 (9) 8 (8) 0.125 0.125
Patients, TC (mmol/l)
 Normal (%) 53 (44.1) 21 (17.5) 22 (18.2) 0.528 0.27
 High (%) 13 (10.8) 3 (2.5) 8 (6.6) 0.12 0.079
OR of GG genotypes vs. AA+AG, (95% CI), P-value 0.6182 (0.3073–1.244), 0.2158
Controls, HDL-C (mmol/l)
 Normal (%) 53 (53) 26 (26) 7 (7) 0.66 0.2
 High (%) 5 (5) 5 (5) 4 (4) 0.075 0.065
Patients, HDL-C (mmol/l)
 Normal (%) 20 (16.6) 73 (60.8) 13 (10.7) 0.48 0.411
 High (%) 6 (5) 5 (4.1) 3 (2.5) 0.07 0.045
OR of GG genotypes vs. AA+AG, (95%CI), P-value 1.730 (0.7222–4.143), 0.0247
Controls, LDL-C (mmol/)
 Normal (%) 23 (23) 60 (60) 5 (5) 0.475 0.455
 High (%) 8 (8) 4 (4) 0 (0) 0.10 0.04
Patients, LDL-C (mmol/l)
 Normal (%) 65 (45.1) 19 (15.7) 9 (7.5) 0.62 0.153
 High (%) 8 (6.6) 15 (12.5) 4 (3.3) 0.129 0.095
OR of GG genotypes vs. AA+AG, (95% CI), P-value 0.2043 (0.06718–0.6215), 0.0039

Data are presented as percentages, unless otherwise specified. The odds ratios were calculated by using the wild-type genotype as the reference group. The odds ratios for coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated genotypes with lipid parameters for CAD patient samples versus controls demonstrated a significant association of lower high-density lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) levels with GG genotypes. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-C.