Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 17;1(2):269–274. doi: 10.3892/br.2013.56

Table II.

Meta-analysis of FAS/FASL polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk.

Variables Na G vs. A GG vs. AA GA vs. AA GG/GA vs. AA GG vs. GA/AA





OR (95% CI) P-valueb OR (95% CI) P-valueb OR (95% CI) P-valueb OR (95% CI) P-valueb OR (95% CI) P-valueb
FAS-670 A/G
  Overall 10 1.016 (0.898–1.149)c 0.028 0.944 (0.729–1.222) 0.058 1.034 (0.768–1.393) 0.000 1.043 (0.797–1.366) 0.000 0.999 (0.784–1.274) 0.004
  Studies with HWE 8 0.984 (0.860–1.125) 0.029 0.960 (0.727–1.267) 0.034 0.911 (0.711–1.167) 0.010 0.932 (0.738–1.176) 0.012 1.019 (0.828–1.254) 0.078
  Ethnicity
    Asian 6 0.996 (0.815–1.217) 0.009 0.909 (0.595–1.386) 0.020 1.011 (0.660–1.547) 0.000 1.032 (0.695–1.531) 0.000 0.931 (0.590–1.469) 0.001
    Mixed 2 0.996 (0.822–1.206) 0.547 0.897 (0.601–1.340) 0.347 0.915 (0.459–1.824) 0.084 0.892 (0.624–1.275) 0.131 1.061 (0.806–1.396) 0.794
  Source of controls
    PB 4 0.998 (0.795–1.254) 0.018 0.981 (0.610–1.577) 0.022 1.005 (0.718–1.408) 0.041 0.997 (0.712–1.397) 0.027 0.991 (0.671–1.464) 0.030
    HB 6 1.002 (0.892–1.124) 0.127 0.880 (0.680–1.138) 0.268 1.097 (0.646–1.864) 0.000 1.112 (0.699–1.770) 0.001 1.001 (0.703–1.424) 0.013
FAS-1377 G/A
A vs. G AA vs. GG AG vs. GG AA/AG vs. GG AA vs. AG/GG
  Overall 5 0.993 (0.880–1.122) 0.254 1.000 (0.757–1.322) 0.402 0.926 (0.781–1.097) 0.153 0.950 (0.808–1.117) 0.167 1.105 (0.853–1.432) 0.492
  Ethnicity
    Asian 3 0.952 (0.830–1.092) 0.195 0.949 (0.701–1.284) 0.201 0.854 (0.699–1.044) 0.149 0.879 (0.726–1.063) 0.165 1.076 (0.814–1.420) 0.215
  Source of controls
  HB 4 1.000 (0.860–1.162) 0.150 1.043 (0.747–1.458) 0.279 0.878 (0.710–1.085) 0.111 0.925 (0.756–1.131) 0.100 1.201 (0.882–1.634) 0.480
FASL -844 T/C
C vs. T CC vs. TT TC vs. TT CC/TC vs. TT CC vs. TC/TT
  Overall 6 1.116 (0.914–1.364) 0.006 1.168 (0.903–1.510) 0.165 1.111 (0.896–1.378) 0.858 1.131 (0.922–1.385) 0.445 1.114 (0.829–1.498) 0.008
  Studies with HWE 5 1.007 (0.895–1.134) 0.656 0.994 (0.749–1.319) 0.863 1.074 (0.856–1.347) 0.892 1.055 (0.851–1.308) 0.850 0.982 (0.829–1.162) 0.722
  Ethnicity
    Asian 3 1.221 (0.877–1.699) 0.012 1.215 (0.714–2.068) 0.171 1.266 (0.823–1.949) 0.801 1.477 (0.979–2.229) 0.387 1.269 (0.825–1.952) 0.005
  Source of controls
  PB 2 1.235 (0.713–2.139) 0.000 1.503 (0.501–4.504) 0.010 1.113 (0.751–1.649) 0.294 1.332 (0.590–3.010) 0.052 1.306 (0.656–2.599) 0.000
  HB 4 1.048 (0.904–1.214) 0.648 1.061 (0.744–1.513) 0.815 1.110 (0.859–1.436) 0.842 1.099 (0.861–1.403) 0.824 1.029 (0.823–1.287) 0.644
a

Number of comparisons.

b

P-value of Q-test for heterogeneity test.

c

Random effects model was used when P value for heterogeneity test was 0.05, otherwise the fixed effects model was used. HB, hospital based case control study; PB, population based case control study; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.