Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan;10(1):20130879. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0879

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Effect of parasitism on community composition for IGP systems, with respect to relative competitive advantage of IGprey (intraspecific competition ratio, IGpredator : IGprey: α2α2/α1α1; a–d) and cannibalism (k1 = k2; e,f); (a) without parasite; (b) parasite with density-only (mortality) effects (Ω1 = 0.1, Ω2 = 0.3); (c,d) with trait-only effects (c: ρ1 = ρ2 = 0.5; d: ρ1 = ρ2 = 2.0; Ω1 = Ω2 = 0); (e) density-only effects (Ω1 = 0.1, Ω2 = 0.3); (f) density and trait effects (Ω1 = 0.1, Ω2 = 0.3, ρ1 = ρ2 = 0.5). Solid lines: equilibrium population density (m−2) (blue, IGprey; red, IGpredator); dashed lines: %parasite prevalence (blue, %prevalence in IGprey; red, %prevalence in IGpredator; grey, %prevalence across both hosts). Parameter subscripts: 1, IGprey; 2, IGpredator.