Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 21;13:529. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-529

Table 5.

Efficiency results for 2009 and 2010 (input orientation)

 
Model I
 
Model II
 
Model III
 
Model IV
Year 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010
θ CRS average
0.793
0.816
0.764
0.769
0.913
0.935
0.918
min θ CRS
0.581
0.569
0.469
0.465
0.761
0.817
0.745
DMU with min θ CRS
2
2
21
11
11
11
2
Number of efficient DMUs (CRS)
4
6
5
6
8
8
6
DMUs with θ CRS >95%
4
6
6
7
9
11
12
DMUs with θ CRS <60%
2
1
5
3
0
0
0
Most common benchmarks (CRS)
22
22
17
17
17
17
8
θ VRS average
0.852
0.857
0.839
0.849
0.944
0.961
0.928
min θ VRS
0.585
0.595
0.581
0.520
0.775
0.835
0.754
DMU with min θ VRS
11
2
21
15
11
15
2
Number of efficient DMUs (VRS)
7
8
8
7
11
13
9
DMUs with θ VRS >95%
9
8
8
9
13
15
12
DMUs with θ VRS <60%
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
Most common benchmarks (VRS)
15
13 e 22
5
17
17
13 e 17
14
θ Scale average
0.935
0.954
0.905
0.903
0.968
0.972
0.990
min θ Scale
0.722
0.783
0.690
0.622
0.837
0.848
0.960
DMU with min θ Scale
15
17
9
9
12
5
9
Number of scale efficient DMUs
4
6
5
6
8
8
7
DMUs with θ Scale >95%
11
17
8
10
17
17
22
DMUs with θ Scale <60% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0