Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 21;13:529. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-529

Table 6.

Efficiency results for 2009 and 2010 (output orientation)

 
Model I
 
Model II
 
Model III
 
Model IV
Year 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010
θ CRS average
1,3010
1,264
1,383
1,380
1,104
1,076
1,099
max θ CRS
1,722
1,758
2,132
2,149
1,314
1,224
1,343
DMU with max θ CRS
2
2
21
11
11
11
2
Number of efficient DMUs (CRS)
4
6
5
6
8
8
6
DMUs with θ CRS <1,05
4
6
6
7
9
11
12
DMUs with θ CRS >1,6
3
3
6
5
0
0
0
Most common Benchmark
22
22
17
17
17
17
8
θ VRS average
1,154
1,134
1,307
1,292
1,049
1,037
1,084
max θ VRS
1,585
1,590
2,125
2,017
1,306
1,188
1,3367
DMU with max θ VRS
5
5
21
11
11
11
2
Number of efficient DMUs (VRS)
7
8
8
7
11
13
9
DMUs with θ VRS <1,05
10
10
8
9
14
15
12
DMUs with θ VRS >1,6
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
Most common Benchmark
17
13
17
17
17
17
8 e 14
θ Scale average
1,132
1,115
1,062
1,070
1,053
1,037
1,014
max θ Scale
1,432
1,412
1,449
1,607
1,189
1,179
1,094
DMU with max θ Scale
15
1
9
9
1
5
15
Number of scale efficient DMUs
4
6
5
6
8
8
6
DMUs with θ Scale <1,05
9
10
13
12
14
16
21
DMUs with θ Scale >1,6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0