Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2014 Feb;94(2):223–231. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9801-z

Table 2.

Percentages of BMI Groups Treated for Fracture at Various Locations

Underweight (1) Non-obese (2) Obese (3) P values
Comparison Unadjusted Adjusteda
Office 77.1 (68.1-86.1) 68.5 (66.9-70.2) 69.1 (66.1-72.1) (1) vs. (2) 0.09 0.08
Hospital 75.3 (66.1-84.5) 69.9 (68.2-71.5) 70.6 (67.6-73.5)
Surgery 45.9 (33.4-58.4) 38.7 (36.6-40.7) 40.6 (36.7-44.4)
Nursing home/rehabilitation
center
28.6 (18.9-38.2) 17.7 (16.4-19.1) 18.8 (16.2-21.4) (1) vs. (2) 0.01

Data are expressed as percentages (95% confidence intervals)

a

Controlled for different comorbidities for each model: office = high cholesterol and emphysema; hospital = hypertension, cholesterol, asthma, emphysema and diabetes; surgery = hypertension, heart disease, cholesterol, emphysema and osteoarthritis; nursing home/rehab = hypertension, heart disease, cholesterol, emphysema, osteoarthritis and diabetes. Controlled for eight fracture types in each adjusted model: wrist, spine, rib, hip, pelvis, ankle, upper and lower leg