Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2014 Feb;94(2):223–231. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9801-z

Table 4.

HRQL Scores and P Values for Comparisons Between BMI Groups

Underweight (1) Non-obese (2) Obese (3) Significant P values
EQ-5D before fracture 0.69 (0.64-0.74) 0.76 (0.75-0.77) 0.72 (0.70-0.73) (1) vs. (2),a (2) vs. (3)a
EQ-5D after fracture 0.66 (0.61-0.71) 0.73 (0.72-0.74) 0.69 (0.67-0.70) (2) vs. (3)a
Reduction in EQ-5D 0.02 (−0.02-0.07) 0.03 (0.02-0.04) 0.03 (0.02-0.04)
Physical function before fracture 67.0 (60.9-73.1) 70.0 (69.0-71.0) 55.4 (53.6-57.3) (1) vs. (3),b (2) vs. (3)b
Physical function after fracture 59.6 (53.1-66.0) 64.8 (63.7-65.9) 50.9 (48.9-52.8) (1) vs. (3),b (2) vs. (3)b
Reduction in physical function 7.2 (2.6-11.8) 5.1 (4.4-5.9) 4.7 (3.2-6.1)
Vitality score before fracture 53.7 (49.1-58.3) 58.4 (57.7-59.2) 50.8 (49.4-52.2) (2) vs. (3)b
Vitality score after fracture 50.3 (45.5-55.1) 56.0 (55.3-56.8) 50.0 (48.5-51.5) (2) vs. (3)b
Reduction in vitality score 3.0 (−0.6-6.6) 2.3 (1.7-2.9) 1.0 (−0.1-2.1)

Data are unadjusted means (95% confidence intervals)

BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, HRQL health-related quality of life

a

Alpha level ≤ 0.017 for pair-wise unadjusted comparisons

b

Alpha level ≤ 0.017 for pair-wise unadjusted and adjustedc comparisons

c

Adjusted for age, comorbidities (hypertension, heart disease, high cholesterol, asthma, emphysema, osteoarthritis and diabetes), and fracture type (clavicle, upper arm, wrist, spine, rib, hip, pelvis, ankle, upper and lower leg)