Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):529–538. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130048

Table 3.

Unadjusted and Risk-Adjusted Change in Blood Pressure (BP) and Goal Attainment Rates by Initial Antihypertensive Treatment Strategy

Outcomes FDC* FEC* Mono* p values
(n=795) (n=712) (n=7,169) FDC vs. FEC FDC vs. Mono FEC vs. Mono
Systolic, mm Hg
 BP at index, mean (SD) 153.8 (16.5) 147.8 (16.4) 148.2 (14.7) <0.001 <0.001 0.47
 BP at follow-up, mean (SD) 132.3 (16.1) 137.5 (18.6) 134.9 (16.1) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Unadjusted change, mean (SD) −21.5 (20.5) −10.3 (20.7) −13.3 (17.9) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Risk-adjusted change, mean (SD) −17.3 (11.6) −12.0 (11.5) −13.6 (10.2) <0.001 <0.001 0.04
Diastolic, mm Hg
 BP at index, mean (SD) 94.3 (11.1) 85.9 (12.2) 90.4 (10.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 BP at follow-up, mean (SD) 82.0 (10.6) 79.8 (11.7) 82.8 (10.5) <0.001 0.06 <0.001
 Unadjusted change, mean (SD) −12.3 (12.3) −6.1 (12.5) −7.6 (11.4) <0.001 <0.001 0.003
 Risk-adjusted change, mean (SD) −10.1 (6.8) −6.0 (7.5) −7.9 (6.6) <0.001 <0.001 0.34
Goal attainment
 Unadjusted at goal, n (%) 440 (55.4) 226 (37.4) 3,267 (45.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Risk-adjusted at goal, n (%) 455 (57.2) 303 (42.5) 3,216 (44.9) <0.001 <0.001 0.69
*

Abbrev: FDC, fixed-dose combinations; FEC, free-equivalent combinations; Mono, monotherapy.

Unadjusted p values were from analysis of variance (ANOVA) or logistic regression while risk-adjusted p values were from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or logistic regression.