Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;38(3):151–160. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3182a3d353

Table 2a.

Summary of regression modeling of post-stroke duration and post-training PLIC integrity for baseline performance and motor learning

Stroke Group Predictors R2 F statistic Significance βPSD βage βipsi βcontra
Baseline Performance
Model 1 PSD, age 0.379 3.050 0.092 0.459 0.231
Model 2 PSD, age, FAIpsi 0.446 2.415 0.134 0.730 0.122 0.347
Model 3 PSD, age, FAIpsi, FAContra 0.458 1.692 0.244 0.787 0.199 0.381 0.157
Day 7 - Day 1 Change
Model 1 PSD, age 0.008 0.041 0.960 0.049 0.053
Model 2 PSD, age, FAIpsi 0.649 5.545 0.020* −0.788* 0.393 −1.073*
Model 3 PSD, age, FAIpsi, FAContra 0.746 5.885 0.016* −0.948* 0.175 −1.167* −0.441

Healthy Group Predictors R2 F statistic Significance βage βipsi βcontra
Baseline Performance
Model 1 Age 0.142 1.163 0.317 −0.377
Model 2 Age, FAIpsi 0.190 0.705 0.531 −0.366 0.219
Model 3 Age, FAIpsi, FAContra 0.226 0.487 0.706 −0.443 −0.121 0.394
Day 7 - Day 1 Change
Model 1 Age 0.241 2.226 0.179 0.491
sdModel 2 Age, FAIpsi 0.241 0.954 0.437 0.491 −0.003
Model 3 Age, FAIpsi, FAContra 0.244 0.537 0.677 0.511 0.082 −0.099