Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2012 Jul;16(5):1121–1132. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0176-3

Table 4.

Counselor-Level: Major and Secondary Outcomes

MINIMAL INTERVENTION ENHANCED INTERVENTION
Baseline (N=103) Follow-up (N=78) BL to FU Baseline (N=120) Follow-up (N=88) BL to FU MI vs. EI
Major Outcome
Women clients counseled % % β 1 % % β 1 β 2
1. None 11.8 1.4 16.2 3.8
2. Less than half 19.6 15.1 17.8 12.5
3. About half 12.7 6.8 6.8 11.3
4. More than half 17.6 26.0 25.4 20.0
5. All 38.2 50.7 33.9 52.5
Mean Score 3.5 4.1 67*** 3.4 4.1 .63** −.03
Men clients counseled Baseline (N=95) Follow-up (N=85) Baseline (N=115) Follow-up (N=75)
1. None 22.1 14.7 29.6 13.3
2. Less than half 26.3 16.2 22.6 18.7
3. About half 12.6 7.4 9.6 13.3
4. More than half 13.7 26.5 12.2 13.3
5. All 25.3 35.3 26.1 41.3
Mean Score 2.9 3.5 67*** 2.8 3.5 71** .04
Secondary Outcomes
Mean Mean β 1 Mean Mean β 1 β 2
Knowledge of the FC (possible range:1-11) 6.6 6.3 .41* 7.0 8.1 1.81*** 1.41***
Attitudes: negative aspects of the FC (possible range:1-4) 2.8 2.7 −.04 2.7 2.9 .15* .20*
Attitudes: sexual pleasure inhibition (possible range:1-4) 2.9 2.9 −.04 2.9 3.0 .13* .17**
Intention to counsel clients on the FC (possible range:1-7) 5.1 5.2 .13 5.2 5.1 −.08 −.21
Peer norms for promoting the FC (possible range:1-5) 3.2 3.5 .25* 3.1 3.3 .21 −.03
Self-efficacy for promoting the FC (possible range:1-7) 5.2 5.5 .29 5.0 5.5 .50 .21
1

Represents the change over time in mean counselor scores from baseline to follow-up for the indicated group (MI or EI).

2

Represents the difference in mean score change over time (from baseline to follow-up) between counselors in the MI and EI conditions.

*

p< .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001