Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 22;2014:862796. doi: 10.1155/2014/862796

Table 6.

Chromatographically determined and computationally estimated log⁡K OW values of studied ruthenium complexes.

Comp. Chromatographically determined Estimated
Model number Based on ab initio (DFT) computations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ΔG sol (oct) (kcal/mol) ΔG sol (water) (kcal/mol) log⁡K OW
Ru-1 4.26 ± 0.37 4.03 ± 0.38 4.19 ± 0.42 4.31 ± 0.56 4.31 ± 0.28 4.38 ± 0.34 3.72 −13.85 −19.81 4.36
Ru-2 4.13 ± 0.37 3.91 ± 0.37 4.09 ± 0.41 4.13 ± 0.55 4.39 ± 0.28 4.63 ± 0.35 3.65 −13.27 −19.35 4.45
Ru-3 4.13 ± 0.37 3.91 ± 0.37 4.09 ± 0.41 3.74 ± 0.52 4.38 ± 0.28 4.68 ± 0.36 3.97 −9.99 −17.63 5.59
Ru-4 3.42 ± 0.33 3.43 ± 0.35 3.50 ± 0.38 3.86 ± 0.52 3.52 ± 0.25 3.47 ± 0.30 2.91 −14.48 −19.60 3.75
Ru-5 3.18 ± 0.32 3.24 ± 0.34 3.08 ± 0.36 3.63 ± 0.51 3.47 ± 0.24 3.59 ± 0.30 2.63 −14.99 −19.97 3.65
Ru-6 1.81 ± 0.30 1.72 ± 0.32 1.81 ± 0.34 1.99 ± 0.45 2.00 ± 0.22 2.11 ± 0.27 1.63 −20.77 −23.24 1.81
Ru-7 1.15 ± 0.31 1.07 ± 0.33 1.15 ± 0.35 1.24 ± 0.46 0.98 ± 0.23 0.87 ± 0.28 1.14 −20.51 −22.57 1.50
Ru-8 1.61 ± 0.30 1.59 ± 0.32 1.68 ± 0.34 1.49 ± 0.45 1.88 ± 0.22 2.09 ± 0.27 1.78 −19.35 −21.61 1.66
Ru-9 2.33 ± 0.30 2.36 ± 0.32 2.39 ± 0.34 2.55 ± 0.46 2.44 ± 0.22 2.46 ± 0.27 2.14 −16.88 −19.70 2.06
Ru-10 2.99 ± 0.32 2.80 ± 0.33 2.56 ± 0.34 2.87 ± 0.47 3.27 ± 0.24 3.63 ± 0.31 2.59 −15.64 −19.15 2.57