Table 6.
Chromatographically determined and computationally estimated logK OW values of studied ruthenium complexes.
| Comp. | Chromatographically determined | Estimated | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model number | Based on ab initio (DFT) computations | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ΔG sol (oct) (kcal/mol) | ΔG sol (water) (kcal/mol) | logK OW | |
| Ru-1 | 4.26 ± 0.37 | 4.03 ± 0.38 | 4.19 ± 0.42 | 4.31 ± 0.56 | 4.31 ± 0.28 | 4.38 ± 0.34 | 3.72 | −13.85 | −19.81 | 4.36 |
| Ru-2 | 4.13 ± 0.37 | 3.91 ± 0.37 | 4.09 ± 0.41 | 4.13 ± 0.55 | 4.39 ± 0.28 | 4.63 ± 0.35 | 3.65 | −13.27 | −19.35 | 4.45 |
| Ru-3 | 4.13 ± 0.37 | 3.91 ± 0.37 | 4.09 ± 0.41 | 3.74 ± 0.52 | 4.38 ± 0.28 | 4.68 ± 0.36 | 3.97 | −9.99 | −17.63 | 5.59 |
| Ru-4 | 3.42 ± 0.33 | 3.43 ± 0.35 | 3.50 ± 0.38 | 3.86 ± 0.52 | 3.52 ± 0.25 | 3.47 ± 0.30 | 2.91 | −14.48 | −19.60 | 3.75 |
| Ru-5 | 3.18 ± 0.32 | 3.24 ± 0.34 | 3.08 ± 0.36 | 3.63 ± 0.51 | 3.47 ± 0.24 | 3.59 ± 0.30 | 2.63 | −14.99 | −19.97 | 3.65 |
| Ru-6 | 1.81 ± 0.30 | 1.72 ± 0.32 | 1.81 ± 0.34 | 1.99 ± 0.45 | 2.00 ± 0.22 | 2.11 ± 0.27 | 1.63 | −20.77 | −23.24 | 1.81 |
| Ru-7 | 1.15 ± 0.31 | 1.07 ± 0.33 | 1.15 ± 0.35 | 1.24 ± 0.46 | 0.98 ± 0.23 | 0.87 ± 0.28 | 1.14 | −20.51 | −22.57 | 1.50 |
| Ru-8 | 1.61 ± 0.30 | 1.59 ± 0.32 | 1.68 ± 0.34 | 1.49 ± 0.45 | 1.88 ± 0.22 | 2.09 ± 0.27 | 1.78 | −19.35 | −21.61 | 1.66 |
| Ru-9 | 2.33 ± 0.30 | 2.36 ± 0.32 | 2.39 ± 0.34 | 2.55 ± 0.46 | 2.44 ± 0.22 | 2.46 ± 0.27 | 2.14 | −16.88 | −19.70 | 2.06 |
| Ru-10 | 2.99 ± 0.32 | 2.80 ± 0.33 | 2.56 ± 0.34 | 2.87 ± 0.47 | 3.27 ± 0.24 | 3.63 ± 0.31 | 2.59 | −15.64 | −19.15 | 2.57 |