Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 5;90(2):272–278. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0461

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for 60 sachet water samples, stratified by purchase location and brand reputation, greater Accra, Ghana*

Characteristic Old Fadama Old Tulaku Significance
Good Poor Good Poor
Nominal measures: count (%)
Discounted price **
 No 15 (25) 12 (20) 15 (25) 4 (7)
 Yes 0 (0) 3 (5) 0 (0) 11 (18)
Vendor type §
 Store 0 (0) 2 (3) 5 (8) 4 (7)
 Stall 4 (7) 7 (12) 7 (12) 11 (18)
 Mobile 11 (18) 6 (10) 3 (5) 0 (0)
Stored in sun #
 No 6 (10) 8 (13) 11 (18) 13 (22)
 Yes 9 (15) 7 (12) 4 (7) 2 (3)
Chilled for purchase
 No 1 (2) 4 (7) 1 (2) 4 (7)
 Yes 14 (23) 11 (18) 14 (23) 11 (18)
Vendor is a wholesaler
 No 15 (25) 12 (20) 14 (23) 14 (23)
 Yes 0 (0) 3 (5) 1 (2) 1 (2)
Cheap plastic wrapper
 No 15 (25) 12 (20) 15 (25) 13 (22)
 Yes 0 (0) 3 (5) 0 (0) 2 (3)
Continuous measures: mean (SD)
Days in stock 2.3 (3.6) 1.9 (1.3) 2.7 (2.7) 5.7 (7.6) ††
Total coliforms 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 28.7 (50.6) **
Fecal coliforms 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Escherichia coli 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Total heterotrophic bacteria 201.9 (484.5) 255.1 (502.8) 106.6 (359.0) 589.4 (813.5) §
*

Statistical significance was determined by using Pearson's chi-square test for nominal measures and analysis of variance for continuous measures.

P < 0.001 for differences across pooled quality reputation (good vs. poor).

P < 0.05.

§

P < 0.10.

P < 0.001 for differences across location (Old Fadama vs. Old Tulaku).

#

P < 0.01.

**

P < 0.05.

††

P < 0.10.