Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2013 Nov 13;85(23):11440–11448. doi: 10.1021/ac402516u

Table 1.

Chemical Composition of HDL Subfractions H1 through H5 Obtained From Healthy Normolipidemic Donors (n=6)

Subfraction Fraction Distribution (%) Total Protein (%) PL (%) TG (%) FC (%) CE (%) TC (%)
H1 59.9 ± 2.5 54.1 ± 6.9 23.5 ± 4.7 2.9 ± 2.2 3.2 ± 1.5 16.3 ± 3.7 19.5 ± 4.9
H2 13.1 ± 1.4 58.5 ± 3.8 20.9 ± 2.8 1.9 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.7 16.4 ± 2.9 18.7 ± 3.6
H3 15.5 ± 1.5 57.2 ± 2.5 18.4 ± 1.4 6.4 ± 3.6 0.9 ± 0.7a 17.1 ± 3.1 18.0 ± 3.6
H4 3.8 ± 0.4 56.9 ± 4.5 20.5 ± 4.5 7.4 ± 4.1b 1.2 ± 1.3a 14.1 ± 2.1 15.2 ± 3.2
H5 7.7 ± 1.0 55.8 ± 6.9 17.3 ± 6.7 8.5 ± 4.6a,b 2.3 ± 1.8 16.1 ± 2.5 18.4 ± 4.2

Data expressed as mean ± SD. PL, phospholipids; TG, triglycerides; FC, free cholesterol; CE, cholesteryl ester; TC, total cholesterol. The distributions of fraction components were compared by using one-way analysis of variance with the Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test.

a

P<0.05 vs H1

b

P<0.05 vs H2. The percentage of total protein, PL, TG, and TC was determined by dividing each respective amount by the total combined amount in each subfraction. Thus, the sum of the percentages of total protein, PL, TG, and TC add up to 100%. TC (%) is equal to the sum of FC (%) and CE (%). The fraction distribution represents the integrated area of each subfraction on fast protein liquid chromatography divided by that of all fractions.