Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 4;3(1):84–90. doi: 10.1007/s13669-013-0071-6

Table 2.

Retrospective studies of salvage chemotherapy for resistant or relapsed gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Authors, Year (Ref) Primary Therapy Salvage Therapy Participants Outcomes Toxicity Remarks
Newland et al. 2000 [47] EMA-CO EMA-EP 34 resistant/ relapsed

22 Non-assessable (hCG levels approaching normal)

12 Assessable: CR 75 %, OS 88 %

≥G3 neutropenia 68 %

≥G3 thrombocytopenia 40 %

Matsui et al. 2002 [48]

MEA /

EMA-CO

FA 10 resistant/ relapsed OS 80 %

G4 leukocytopenia 6 %

G4 thrombocytopenia 4 %

Mean FU 10 yr

1 had adjuvant surgery

Xiang et al. 2004 [49] N/A EMA-EP

12 resistant

3 PSTT

CR 11/15 (73 %)

PR 3/15 (20 %)

N/A
Ngan et al. 2006 [12] CHAMOC / MA MBE

A: 8 resistant

B: 8 relapsed

C: 4 ultra-high-risk

A: CR 88 %, 5-yr DFS 75 %

B: CR 88 %

C: CR 75 %

Overall CR 85 %

≥G3 neutropenia 12 (60 %)

≥G3 thrombocytopenia 4 (20 %)

1 had adjuvant surgery

6 had brain radiation

1 had liver radiation

Wang et al. 2006 [50] Various MEF 9 resistant/ relapsed

CR 7/9 (78 %)

OS 8/9 (96 %)

≥G3 neutropenia 26 %

≥G3 thrombocytopenia 5 %

Mean FU 37 mth
Mao et at. 2007 [51] EMA-CO EMA-EP

A: 11 resistant

B: 7 relapsed

A: CR 9/11 (82 %)

B: CR 3/7 (43 %)

Overall CR 12/18 (67 %)

≥G3 neutropenia 28 %

≥G3 thrombocytopenia 3 %

G3 hepatotixicity 3 %

8 had adjuvant surgery
Wan et al. 2007 [52] Various FAEV 11 resistant CR 7/11 (64 %) N/A
Lu et al. 2008 [53] EMA-CO EMA -EP

10 resistant

3 relapsed

CR 11/13 (85 %) N/A 5 had adjuvant surgery / brain radiation
Wang et al. 2008 [54] Various TP/TE

A: 16 relapsed

(6 with failed cisplatin based regimen)

B: 8 toxicities with previous therapy

A: Response rate 50 %: CR 3 (19 %), PR 5 (31 %)

OS 44 % (70 % if 6 with failed cisplatin based regimen excluded)

B: CR 2, PR 2, Non-assessable 4

OS 75 %

≥G3 neutropenia 10 (42 %)

≥G3 thrombocytopenia 3 (13 %)

G2 renal toxicity 1 (4 %)

Discontinued due to G3 neuropathy 1 (4 %)

A: Median FU 24 mth

B: Median FU 19 mth

Zhao et al. 2009 [55] FA BEP 12 resistant CR 10/12 (83 %) N/A
Feng et al. 2011 [56] Various: mainly FAV, EMA-CO, 5-FU FAEV 91 resistant/ relapsed

CR 55/91 (60 %)

NR 29/91 (32 %)

3-yr OS 75 %

≥G3 neutropenia 24 (26.4 %)

Febrile neutropenia 6 (6.6 %)

≥G3 thrombocytopenia 3 (3.3 %)

Discontinued due to toxicity 7 (7.7 %)

23 of 55 SCR had adjuvant surgery
Lurain et al. 2012 [11] EMA-CO

Various:

EMA-EP; BEP; VIP; ICE; TP/TE

28 resistant CR 82 % N/A

11 had adjuvant surgery

4 had brain radiation

Manopunya et at. 2012 [57] Various FA 5 resistant (≥3 prior chemotherapy regimens) CR 1/5 (20 %)

G4 neutropenia 25 %

G3 diarrhoea 8 %

G2/3 mucositis 92 %

EMA-CO: etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin-D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine; FA: 5-fluorouracil, actinomycin-D; CHAMOC: cyclophosphamide, hydroxyurea, actinomycin-D, methotrexate with folinic acid and vincristine; MA: methotrexate, actinomycin-D; MEA: methotrexate, etoposide, actinomycin-D; FAV: 5-fluorouracil, actinomycin-D, vincristine; 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; EMA-EP: etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin-D, etoposide, cisplatin; EP: etoposide, cisplatin; MEF: methotrexate, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil; BEP: bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin; VIP: vincristine, ifosfamide, cisplatin; ICE: ifosfamide, cisplatin, etoposide; TP/TE: paclitaxel, cisplatin/paclitaxel, etoposide; MBE: methotrexate, bleomycin, etoposide; FAEV: floxuridine, actinomycin-D, etoposide, vincristine; PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumour; hCG: human chorionic gonadotrophin; CR: complete response; OS: overall survival; PR: partial response; NR: no response; DFS: disease free survival; N/A: not available; FU: follow-up