Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 11;5:49. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00049

Table 1.

Proposed magnetofossil robustness criteria (Kopp and Kirschvink, 2008).

Context Criteria
Environment analogous to younger magnetofossil bearing environments; *S ≥ 3; or
S ≥ 2 and **C ≥ 3; or
S ≥ 2 and C ≥ 2 and ***ChP
Paleomagnetic data robust
Environment analogous to younger magnetofossil bearing environments; S ≥ 3 and ChP; or
S ≥ 3 and C ≥ 3; or
S ≥ 3 and C ≥ 2 and ChP
Paleomagnetic data not robust
Environment analogous to younger magnetofossil-bearing environment; S = 4 and ChP; or
S ≥ 3 and C ≥ 3 and ChP; or
S ≥ 3 and C ≥ 2 and ChP and ****CrP
Sediments have undergone burial metamorphism or paleomagnetic data remagnetized
Unique environment S = 4 and C ≥ 3 and ChP and CrP
*

S, size and shape score;

**

C, chain quality/length score;

***

ChP, chemical perfection criterion;

****

CrP, crystallographic perfection criterion.