Table 2.
Sample | Stratigraphic context | SD | S | C | ChP | CrP | Age | Robustness | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH 7.0 | ND | + | 4 | 3 | + | + | NA | Robust | Moisescu et al., 2011 |
pH 6.0 | ND | + | 1 | 2 | + | − | NA | Not robust | Moisescu et al., 2011 |
pH 8.0 | ND | + | 2 | 2 | + | − | NA | Not robust | Moisescu et al., 2011 |
pH 9.0 | ND | + | 2 | 1 | + | − | NA | Not robust | Moisescu et al., 2011 |
Chalk deposits | *PQ 5 | + | 2 | 4 | ND | ND | Cretaceous | Robust | Kopp and Kirschvink, 2008 |
Carbonate platform | ND | + | 1 | 2 | ND | ND | Paleoproterozoic | Not robust | Kopp and Kirschvink, 2008 |
For comparison, two examples of robust or not robust magnetofossil samples were included from the analyses of Kopp and Kirschvink (2008).
ND, not determined; NA, not applicable;
paleomagnetic quality index.