Table 3.
Comparing hookah-only users and dual users with cigarette-only users by college status, tobacco-related attitudes, and binge drinking
Hookah-Only User | Dual User | Cigarette-Only | |
---|---|---|---|
Characteristic/Attitude | RRR (95% CI) | RRR (95% CI) | User |
College Status | |||
In college | 2.53 (1.79–3.59)*** | 1.34 (1.12–1.63)** | Ref |
Graduated | 1.54 (1.02–2.34)* | .92 (.73–1.16) | Ref |
No college | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Anti-SHS | 1.03 (.78–1.36) | .76 (.62–.92)** | Ref |
Anti-Tobacco Industry | 2.21 (1.70–2.92)*** | 1.18 (.96–1.45) | Ref |
Ad Receptivity | .70 (.52–.93)* | 1.25 (1.06–1.48)** | Ref |
Binge Drinking | .99 (.74–1.33) | 2.03 (1.63–2.54)*** | Ref |
Notes: The three categories “Nonsmoker,” “Hookah-Only User,” and “Dual User” are compared with the omitted reference category of “Cigarette-Only User.” The model included a category for “Nonsmoker;” results are not displayed in the table. The model also controlled for sex, sexual orientation, age, ethnicity, time, and location, although results are not displayed in the table.
CI = confidence interval; RRR = relative risk ratio; SHS = secondhand smoke
P<.05
P<.01
P<.001