Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(1):10–18. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.842171

Table 3.

Comparing hookah-only users and dual users with cigarette-only users by college status, tobacco-related attitudes, and binge drinking

Hookah-Only User Dual User Cigarette-Only

Characteristic/Attitude RRR (95% CI) RRR (95% CI) User
College Status
    In college 2.53 (1.79–3.59)*** 1.34 (1.12–1.63)** Ref
    Graduated 1.54 (1.02–2.34)* .92 (.73–1.16) Ref
    No college Ref Ref Ref
Anti-SHS 1.03 (.78–1.36) .76 (.62–.92)** Ref
Anti-Tobacco Industry 2.21 (1.70–2.92)*** 1.18 (.96–1.45) Ref
Ad Receptivity .70 (.52–.93)* 1.25 (1.06–1.48)** Ref
Binge Drinking .99 (.74–1.33) 2.03 (1.63–2.54)*** Ref

Notes: The three categories “Nonsmoker,” “Hookah-Only User,” and “Dual User” are compared with the omitted reference category of “Cigarette-Only User.” The model included a category for “Nonsmoker;” results are not displayed in the table. The model also controlled for sex, sexual orientation, age, ethnicity, time, and location, although results are not displayed in the table.

CI = confidence interval; RRR = relative risk ratio; SHS = secondhand smoke

*

P<.05

**

P<.01

***

P<.001