Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2014 Jan;101(1):1–12. doi: 10.1002/bip.22236

Table 1.

Thermodynamic data for different repeat bulge loop sizes:

Oligomer*
Complex
Tm
[°C]
ΔHcal
[kcal mol−1]
ΔScal**
[cal mol−1 K−1]
ΔCp
[cal mol−1 K−1]
ΔGcal25°C
[kcal mol−1]
CAG0·CTG0 duplex 79.1 173.4 492.3 ± 24 1100 21.8
CAG- loops
CAG2·CTG0 67.0 160.1 470.5 1260 16.4
CAG4·CTG0 63.7 164.3 487.7 1390 15.6
CAG6·CTG0 62.3 171.6 511.6 1540 15.7
CAG8·CTG0 61.3 192.2 574.6 1750 17.3
CTG-loops
CTG2·CAG0 67.1 157.4 462.7 380 18.5
CTG4·CAG0 63.1 162.3 482.7 890 16.4
CTG6·CAG0 61.9 185.5 553.6 1170 17.9
CTG8·CAG0 62.2 208.0 620.1 1570 19.7
T-loops***
T2·CTG0 65.2 155.2 458.2 1060 15.8
T4·CTG0 60.5 148.8 446.1 1330 13.2
T6·CTG0 *** 58.6 139.1 419.3 730 12.8
T8·CTG0 56.2 137.1 416.3 1230 11.1
Ave 1090 ± 260
*

We estimate experimental errors to be Tm≈0.3°C, ΔH ≈ 2.5%, ΔS≈5% and ΔCp ≈20%

**

Entropy values determined for pseudo-monomolecular process for Ct =50 µM, as bulge loops of different loop size show variable concentration dependence of Tm. To correct for bimolecular process a mixing term of 21.5 cal mol−1 K−1 needs to be added to the reported value.

***

These all T-bulge loops also form the basis of the DNA meter concept.97, 97

****

Larger error for T6·CTG0 due to older commercially synthesized sample that was less well purified.