Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 19;16(2):101–108. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12083

Table 1.

Setting of the studies reporting the results of the liver-first approach (LFA) in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases including the selection criteria of LFA

Reference Year of publication Country Setting Study period Selection criteria of ‘LFA’
Mentha16 2008 Switzerland Prospective observational study 1998–2007
  • Advanced synchronous colorectal liver metastasesa

  • Age <70

  • Performance status <2

  • Non-occlusive primary tumour

  • At least two liver segments without metastases

  • No or resectable extrahepatic disease

  • Clinical risk score >3

Verhoef17 2009 Netherlands Retrospective observational study 2003–2007
  • Synchronous liver metastases

  • Locally advanced rectal cancer and where it is defined as:

  1. tumour>5 cm at colonoscopy or MRI (clinically large T3); or

  2. clinically fixed tumor or with ingrowth in adjacent organ on MRI (T4); or

  3. N + tumor (lymph node>8 mm on CT or MRI)

Brouquet18 2010 United States Retrospective cohort study 1992–2009
  • Synchronous colorectal liver metastases

  • Criteria not specifically stated but liver resection is planned as soon as the disease was considered resectable, typically after 3 to 5 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy

De Jong19 2011 Netherlands Retrospective Observational study 2005–2010
  • Synchronous colorectal liver metastases

  • Liver remnant post resection includes at least two adjacent liver segments as well as sufficient vascular inflow and outflow and adequate biliary drainage

  • All patients with a primary rectal cancer were considered for the liver-first approach

  • Patients with colorectal cancer located in the colon were selected on a case-to-case basis

a

Criteria of ‘Advanced Synchronous Colorectal Liver metastases’ was not clearly defined.