Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb;21(1):e29–e40. doi: 10.3747/co.21.1311

TABLE IV.

Summary of base-case probabilistic results

Treatment option Mean cycles in mds on treatment (n) Total costs (2012 CA$) Total
Incremental
Cost per ly gained by azacitidine [CA$/ly (95% ci)] Incremental cost per qaly gained by azacitidine [CA$/qaly (95% ci)]
lys qalys Costs incurred by azacitidine (2012 CA$) lys gained by azacitidine qalys gained by azacitidine
ccrs combineda
  Azacitidine na 112,354 2.51 1.96
  ccrs na 35,908 1.50 1.06 76,446 1.01 0.90 75,871 (71,416 to 80,767) 86,182 (69,920 to 107,157)
Specific ccrs
  Preselected for bsc
    Azacitidine 10.59 111,414 2.50 1.95 77,897 1.02 0.91 76,567 (71,675 to 81,550) 86,973 (70,076 to 110,051)
    bsc 15.58 33,517 1.48 1.05
  Preselected for ldc
    Azacitidine 10.95 114,368 2.53 1.98 73,336 0.99 0.88 74,514 (67,083 to 82,932) 84,829 (66,863 to 108,691)
    ldc 6.08 41,032 1.55 1.10
  Preselected for sdc
    Azacitidine 10.91 110,337 2.23 1.74 1,850 0.87 0.71 2,636 (Dominant, 25,819) 2,152 (Dominant, 19,869)
    sdc 2.22 108,486 1.36 1.03
a

The weights of 68% for bsc and 32% for low-dose chemotherapy from the aza-001 trial were applied to calculate the results of comparing the combined conventional care regimens to azacitidine. Standard-dose chemotherapy was excluded from the combination as the base-case results showed it was a cost-ineffective comparator relative to low-dose chemotherapy.

mds = myelodysplastic syndrome; ly = life year; qaly = quality-adjusted life year; ci = confidence interval; ccrs = conventional care regimens; bsc = best supportive care; ldc = low-dose chemotherapy; sdc = standard-dose chemotherapy.