Table 4. Results of the hierarchical multiple regression (HMR) assessing the effects of positive psychological dispositions and interactions with gender on outcome variables (Subscales scores).
Predictors | SOGS-C | PGSI-C | GRCS-C | GUS-C | ||||
ΔR 2 | β a | ΔR 2 | β a | ΔR 2 | β a | ΔR 2 | β a | |
Step 1 | .002 | .018*** | .006* | .011** | ||||
Genderb | −.049 | −.135*** | −.077* | −.106** | ||||
Step 2 | .023** | .014 | .041*** | .068*** | ||||
CEI-Exploration | .067 | .006 | −.009 | .010 | ||||
CEI-Absorption | .039 | .040 | .066 | .022 | ||||
GQ-total | −.006 | −.047 | −.159*** | −.196*** | ||||
AHS-Agency | −.147** | .017 | −.082 | .031 | ||||
AHS-Pathway | −.057 | −.082 | −.057 | −.153** | ||||
PGI-total | .099 | .113* | .124* | .153** | ||||
MAAS-total | −.076* | −.046 | .059 | .067 | ||||
Step 3 | .020* | .010 | .006 | .015 | ||||
Gender×CEI-Exploration | −.061 | −.062 | −.017 | −.054 | ||||
Gender×CEI-Absorption | −.013 | .040 | −.024 | .055 | ||||
Gender×GQ-total | −.044 | .019 | .005 | .025 | ||||
Gender×AHS-Agency | .091 | .002 | −.005 | −.051 | ||||
Gender×AHS-Pathway | .113* | .057 | .084 | .138** | ||||
Gender×PGI-total | −.041 | −.050 | .020 | −.026 | ||||
Gender×MAAS-total | .053 | .078* | −.012 | −.014 | ||||
Total R | 0.214** | 0.205** | 0.230*** | 0.306*** | ||||
Total R 2 | 0.046** | 0.042** | 0.053*** | 0.094*** | ||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.027** | 0.023** | 0.034*** | 0.075*** | ||||
F (15, 740) = | 2.38** | 2.17** | 2.75*** | 5.11*** |
Note:
Standardized beta weights at entry.
Gender: −1 = Male, 1 = Female.
p<0.05.
p<0.01.
p<0.001.