Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 12;34(7):2451–2463. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4291-13.2014

Table 2.

Summary of results using the MI as a regressor to predict functional connectivity

ROI Pcorr z-value MNI coordinates
z-value
Anatomical label
x y z Pretraining post-training
BA2 0.0000 4.5 −48 −40 54 3.3 5.1 L anterior intraparietal sulcus
4.2 −60 −12 40 4.2 6.3 L postcentral gyrus, BA1
0.02 4.2 −42 −8 60 3.0 5.0 L precentral gyrus, BA6
4.3 50 −26 44 3.7 5.7 R postcentral gyrus, BA2
BA3b 0.0000 5.6 6 −26 76 4.7 7.1 L precentral gyrus, BA4
4.5 −2 −28 68 5.3 7.4 R precentral gyrus, BA4
5.0 24 −40 68 8.8 9.9 R postcentral gyrus, BA1/2
SII 0.0002 4.9 −6 −4 50 0.9 4.0 SMA, BA6
0.0003 4.5 12 −24 76 2.0 3.4 R precentral gyrus, BA4
0.02 4.1 −40 −20 42 1.3 4.3 L precentral gyrus, BA4
3.2 −60 −4 30 −1.0 2.2 L PMv, BA6
PMv 0.0000 4.4 2 0 56 4.4 7.2 SMA, BA6
0.007 3.9 18 −16 66 1.7 4.9 R precentral gyrus, BA6
4.4 −46 −18 18 0.3 3.7 L SII, parietal operculum OP1
SMA 0.0000 4.3 12 −30 62 3.4 5.8 R precentral gyrus, BA4
4.0 38 −12 68 0.1 3.2 R precentral gyrus, BA6
0.0001 4.0 −14 −14 62 5.6 8.3 L precentral gyrus, BA6
5.0 26 −58 −24 0.9 −3.1 R Cerebellum, Crus I
3.3 28 −72 −24 1.2 −2.7 R Cerebellum, lobule VI
M1 0.002 4.3 18 −30 60 3.9 6.9 R precentral gyrus, BA4
4.1 10 −24 74 6.7 8.1 R precentral gyrus, BA6
4.0 −6 −28 60 5.4 7.5 L precentral gyrus, BA4

The table shows clusters whose correlation with the corresponding ROI increased reliably with perceptual training. Pcorr, Corrected cluster-level p value related to the regressor of interest (MI); R, right; L, left. The associated z-score for the peak is shown in the z-value column. z-values pertaining and post-training give z-scores at the location of maximum activation based on values averaged over subjects in pretraining and post-training conditions respectively.