Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 21;20(3):829–842. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.829

Table 1.

Summary of included studies on distance management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Author, yr Patients randomized/baseline (N) intervention vs control DiseaseDisease severity Inclusion/exclusion Mean age (yr) Control vs intervention Male (%) Control vs intervention Intervention Control Duration (mo)
Cross et al[26],2012 47 pts rand.14 web vs 18 BAC UC Not specified 40.3 vs 41.7 32 vs 40 UC HAT (Home telemanagement: - a home unit (laptop and electronic weight scale) a decision support server, -a web-based clinician portal Best Available Care (educational material, action plan, clinics visits) 12
Elkjaer et al[27],2010 233 pts rand.105 web vs 106 control UC mild/mod Inclusion: age 18-69 yr, mild/moderate UC, treated with 5- ASAExclusion: acute phase of co-morbid conditions, drug dependence or substance abuse, use of immunomodulators, frequent treatment with high dose systemic corticosteroids, likely requirement of IBD surgery, previous IBD surgery 40 vs 44 (P = 0.03) 49.5 vs 31.1(P = 0.008) Web-intervention (Educational training then www.constant-care.dk) Conventional treatment and follow up in the IBD out-patient clinic 12
Elkjaer et al[27], 2010 100 pts rand.51 web vs 41 control UC Same as above 41 vs 46 60.8 vs 41.5 Web-intervention (Educational training then www.constant-care.dk) Conventional treatment and follow up in the IBD out-patient clinic 12
Kennedy et al[28], 2004Richardson et al[29],2006 700 pts rand.270 interv.365 control Mild/modCD (n = 231)UC or ID (n = 404) Inclusion: UC or CD, over age of 16 yr, able to write English, attending a follow-up clinicExclusion: Not specified 46.3 vs 44.4 43 vs 41.5 Guided self-management- patient guidebook- self-management plan- patient centered approach to care by a trained clinician- direct access to services for patients to self-refer Management process deemed appropriate by the hospital specialist-6 sites follow long term- 2 sites discharge quiescent IBD-1 site no consistent follow up 12
Robinson et al[30],2001 203 pts101 interv.102 control UC Inclusion: newly diagnosedExclusion: require hospital outpatient follow-up for other illnesses, unable to read informed consent or follow written instructions 48 vs 49 48 vs 49 Personalised guided self-management regimen with direct access to outpatient care on request Clinician’s normal treatment and follow-up Until 11 mo after last pt recruited
Williams et al[88], 2000 180 pts 88 interv.92 control CD (n = 78) UC or ID (n = 77)Proctitis (n = 25)Inactive or mildly active Inclusion: over 18 yr, inactive or mildly active but stable IBDExclusion: active disease requiring treatment, stoma, other disease requiring regular follow up, unable to comply with data collection N/A (no significant difference reported) N/A (no significant difference reported) Open access follow up Routine follow up 24

IBDQ: Inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire; SIBDQ: Short-IBDQ; NS: Not significant; ID: Indeterminate colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: Ulcerative colitis.