Table 2.
Modality | Ref. | Number of patients | Diagnostic yield of VCE | Diagnostic yield of the compared modality | IY | P value |
CTE | Eliakim et al[81] | 35 | 77% | 20% | 47% | < 0.05 |
Hara et al[82] | 17 | 71% | 53% | 18% | NA | |
Voderholzer et al[83] | 41 | 61% | 49% (CT enteroclysis) | 12% | < 0.04 | |
Solem et al[84] | 40 | 83% | 83% | 0 | NS | |
MRE | Albert et al[85] | 27 | 93% | 78% | 15% | NS |
Crook et al[22] | 19 | 93% | 71% | 18% | NS | |
Jensen et al[20] | 93 | 100% | 86% | 14% | NS | |
Ileocolonoscopy | Hara et al[82] | 17 | 71% | 65% | 6% | NS |
Solem et al[84] | 40 | 83% | 74% | 9% | NS | |
Leighton et al[86] | 80 | 55% | 25% | 30% | NA |
VCE: Videocapsule endoscopy; CTE: Computed tomography enterography; MRE: Magnetic resonance enterography; IY: Incremental yield; NA: Not available; NS: Non significant.