Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 1;3(1):54–70. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.010

Table 7.

Patients' Rating of Therapy Outcome, Patient Satisfaction With Therapy

Groups Therapy Outcome Rating Satisfaction With therapy Reference no.
Mean Sd Na Mean Sd Na
All patients 7.23 2.39 1275 7.94 2.20 1273 26
Age groups Adults 7.33 2.33 556 8.01 2.16 558 77
Children 7.12 2.56 370 7.87 2.27 371 27
Indications Anxiety disorders 6.82 2.74 50 7.61 2.65 49 29
Asthma 7.54 2.44 65 8.19 2.12 64 30
Attention deficit/hyperactivity symptoms 6.29 2.70 52 7.45 2.12 51 31
Depression 7.54 1.76 74 7.92 1.86 74 31
Low back painb
 -Anthroposophic therapy (AMOS) 7.28 2.31 29 7.62 2.30 29 38
 -Conventional therapy (control group) 5.58 2.55 26 6.50 2.39 26 38
Migraine 7.33 2.42 33 7.72 2.05 32 33
Therapy modalities Medical treatment
 -Prolonged consultations with anthroposophic physicians 7.21 2.64 182 7.81 2.45 182 34
 -Anthroposophic medicinal products 7.12 2.46 550 7.80 2.26 546 41
Art therapy 7.52 1.95 132 8.23 1.79 133 35
Eurythmy therapy 7.42 2.29 349 8.08 2.19 352 36
Rhythmical massage therapy 7.50 2.34 62 8.18 2.08 62 37

Patients' ratings of therapy outcome (0 = no help at all, 10 = helped very much) and patient satisfaction with therapy (0 = very dissatisfied, 10 = very satisfied) at 6-month follow-up, analyzed in all patients and in different age, diagnosis, and therapy modality groups.

a

Patients who returned the 6-month follow-up questionnaire with evaluable responses to the respective item.

b

A nested prospective comparative nonrandomized study of patients with low back pain.38