Table 2.
Category | H | % | O | % | N | % | Total | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Circuit 1 | 354 | 34% | 151 | 47% | 351 | 36% | 856 | 37% |
Circuit 2 | 350 | 34% | 84 | 26% | 317 | 33% | 751 | 32% |
Circuit 3 | 105 | 10% | 50 | 15% | 141 | 15% | 296 | 13% |
Circuit 4 | 20 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 48 | 5% | 68 | 3% |
Circuit 5 | 19 | 2% | 3 | 1% | 8 | 1% | 30 | 1% |
Unpredictable | 194 | 19% | 35 | 11% | 101 | 10% | 330 | 14% |
Total | 1042 | 323 | 966 | 2331 |
Under each subject’s ID (H, N, and O) the number of response patterns that matched each circuit is shown. The percentages are relative to the total observations per subject. Circuit 1 was the most predominant in all subjects, followed by circuit 2. Circuit 3 was observed frequently, whereas circuits 4 and 5 were relatively rare. On average, 14% of the patterns were unexplained by the above circuits.