Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2013 Dec 31;561:30–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.043

Table 2.

Categorization of circuits per subject and in total.

Category H % O % N % Total %
Circuit 1 354 34% 151 47% 351 36% 856 37%
Circuit 2 350 34% 84 26% 317 33% 751 32%
Circuit 3 105 10% 50 15% 141 15% 296 13%
Circuit 4 20 2% 0 0% 48 5% 68 3%
Circuit 5 19 2% 3 1% 8 1% 30 1%
Unpredictable 194 19% 35 11% 101 10% 330 14%
Total 1042 323 966 2331

Under each subject’s ID (H, N, and O) the number of response patterns that matched each circuit is shown. The percentages are relative to the total observations per subject. Circuit 1 was the most predominant in all subjects, followed by circuit 2. Circuit 3 was observed frequently, whereas circuits 4 and 5 were relatively rare. On average, 14% of the patterns were unexplained by the above circuits.