Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Inform Health Soc Care. 2011 Sep;36(3):161–172. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2011.584998

Table 1.

Mean Scores, Factor Loadings, and Variance Explained (N = 93)

Item
(1=strongly disagree –
5=strongly agree)
Mean (S.D.) Perceived
Usefulness
3 Items
ά = .91
Perceived
Ease of Use
3 Items
ά = .89
Barriers
to Use
2 Items
ά = .69
  1. Using the CCR with context-specific links will enhance my effectiveness in my work. 4.27 (0.78) .90
  2. Using the CCR with context-specific links in my work will increase my productivity. 3.91 (0.89) .88
  3. Using the CCR with context-specific links would be helpful in my work. 4.37 (0.69) .83
  4. I anticipate that I will find the CCR with context-specific links easy to use. 3.96 (0.91) .86
  5. I anticipate that I will find it easy to get the CCR with context-specific links to do what I want to do. 3.93 (0.77) .86
  6. My interaction with the CCR with context-specific links will be clear and understandable. 3.95 (0.80) .82
  7. Interacting with the CCR with context-specific links will require a lot of effort on my part. * 3.11 (1.11) .93
  8. Using the CCR with context-specific links will not necessarily improve my performance in my work. * 3.32 (1.13) .80

Percentage Variance Explained 50.35 20.90 13.63
*

Note. Reverse Coded Items – mean scores reflect scores after reverse coding for the factor analysis.