Table 1.
Item (1=strongly disagree – 5=strongly agree) |
Mean (S.D.) | Perceived Usefulness 3 Items ά = .91 |
Perceived Ease of Use 3 Items ά = .89 |
Barriers to Use 2 Items ά = .69 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Using the CCR with context-specific links will enhance my effectiveness in my work. | 4.27 (0.78) | .90 | ||
2. Using the CCR with context-specific links in my work will increase my productivity. | 3.91 (0.89) | .88 | ||
3. Using the CCR with context-specific links would be helpful in my work. | 4.37 (0.69) | .83 | ||
4. I anticipate that I will find the CCR with context-specific links easy to use. | 3.96 (0.91) | .86 | ||
5. I anticipate that I will find it easy to get the CCR with context-specific links to do what I want to do. | 3.93 (0.77) | .86 | ||
6. My interaction with the CCR with context-specific links will be clear and understandable. | 3.95 (0.80) | .82 | ||
7. Interacting with the CCR with context-specific links will require a lot of effort on my part. * | 3.11 (1.11) | .93 | ||
8. Using the CCR with context-specific links will not necessarily improve my performance in my work. * | 3.32 (1.13) | .80 | ||
Percentage Variance Explained | 50.35 | 20.90 | 13.63 |
Note. Reverse Coded Items – mean scores reflect scores after reverse coding for the factor analysis.