Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 27;20(2):279–292. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt039

Table III.

Studies using mixed methods included in the review.

Study, origin Aims Inclusion criteria Sample Study design,
data collection
Related findings
Lewis et al. (2012), USA To understand psychosocial concerns of young African American BC survivors (i) Self-identification as African American; (ii) ≥1 year post-diagnosis; (iii) absence of active treatment other than hormonal therapy; (iv) adequate English skills; (v) ≤45 years at diagnosis n = 33
Mean age at diagnosis: 37.39 (SD = 6.00) (range 25–45 years)
Mean age at interview: not stated
Length time since diagnosis: not stated
Race/ethnicity:
33 (100%) African American
Cross-sectional data from the RCT SPIRIT counselling programme
Semi-structured telephone interview after participants completed the 1-year follow-up assessments at SPIRIT
55% had at least 1 child at cancer diagnosis
45% wanted a child at cancer diagnosis (retrospectively)
48% did not recall discussing infertility with medical team
14% (3/22 who had chemotherapy) were offered option to preserve fertility
4 became pregnant after cancer treatment
1 sought infertility treatment, at the time of interview was trying IVF
2 adopted children after cancer
Braun et al. (2005), Israel Positive and negative motivations towards childbirth of breast cancer survivors and their husbands Survivors (study group): (i) BC at Stages I–III, without metastasis;
(ii) treatment completed at least 2 years prior to the study;
(iii) in remission, since then or with only local recurrence;
(iv) without other physical or mental illness;
(v) ≤40 years old;
(vi) premenopausal or no indication of being menopausal;
(vii) without children or ≤2 (less than the Israeli average);
(viii) Jewish, Hebrew speaking and living in Israel more than 10 years
Controls: (i) without other physical or mental illness;
(ii) ≤40 years old;
(iii) premenopausal or no indication of being menopausal;
(iv) without children or ≤2;
(v) Jewish, Hebrew speaking and living in Israel more than 10 years
Study group: recruitment in 3 hospitals
Control group (healthy women), convenience sample recruited from the community, hospitals and university
n = 30 survivors + 13 survivors' husbands
Survivors group: 35 years mean age (SD = 3.1)
Survivors group (husbands): mean age of 38.2 years (SD = 2.9)
Treatment completed: range 2–5 years before study
n = 29 controls + 15 controls' husbands
Control group: mean age of 31.7 years (SD = 3.9)
Control group (husbands): mean age of 35.2 years (SD = 4.9)
Details on race/ethnicity not reported
Cross-sectional study
BC survivors and husbands compared with healthy women and their husbands
Data collection:
(1) Qualitative component: participants list 3 reasons against and in favour of having children
(2) Quantitative component :
PMQ-R
EMS
BSI
IES
MAC
Quantitative data:
No differences between groups about negative and positive motivations
No differences between groups in the desire for children
Survivors desired less number of children than controls (F(1,49) = 4.86, P < 0.05)
Survivors' husbands desired less number of children than controls
(F(1,25) = 16.67, P < 0.001)
Qualitative data:
Positive motivations BC survivors:
Immortality, big family, siblings for their existing children, happiness and giving meaning to life
BC survivors' unique positive motivations compared with controls: desire to have siblings for their existing children and strong desire to have a big family. Happiness was less reported compared with controls
Negative motivations BC survivors:
Mother's health, child's health, financial concerns, personal restrictions and world view.
BC survivors unique negative motivations compared with controls: concerns over mother's health (most reported motivation). Concerns over child's health were more reported and pessimistic world view, personal restrictions and immaturity were less reported than in controls
Positive motivations not correlated with mental distress. Negative motivations correlated with mental distress only in husbands of BC survivors (r = 0.66, P < 0.05)
BC did not impede overall positive motivations, nor increased negative motivations towards childbirth

BC, breast cancer; SD, standard deviation; PMQ-R, parenthood motivation questionnaire revised; EMS, ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale; BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory; IES, Impact of Event Scale; MAC, Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale.