Skip to main content
. 2013;15(4):161–177.

Table 2.

Studies Examining Intermediate- (2- to 10-Year) and Long-term (≥10-Year) LUTS in Patients Undergoing RP for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Study Authors Length of Follow-up (y) Study Design (Baseline?) Number of Eligible RP Patients LUTS Scale Results
Intermediate-term Studies (2–10 y)
Slova and Lepor95 4 Prospective, longitudinal (baseline) 453 AUASI LUTS improved in men with baseline clinically significant LUTS (AUASS > 7) No LUTS progression in men without baseline clinically significant LUTS (AUASS ≥ 7)
Parker WR et al68 5 Prospective, longitudinal (baseline) 382 EPIC Irritative-Obstructive Domain LUTS improved (88–92.1; P unknown) from baseline to 5-y follow-up
Miller DC et al38 6.2 (median) Prospective, longitudinal cohort (no baseline) 964 (665 RP) EPIC Irritative-Obstructive Domain LUTS unchanged from 2.6–6.2 y median follow-up
LUTS also unchanged in noncancer controls over same interval
Long-term Studies (≥10 y)
Prabhu V et al74 (NYUPLOS) 10 Prospective, longitudinal (baseline) 1788 AUASI (Same findings at 10 y as Slova and Lepor95 above)

AUASI, American Urological Association Symptom Index; AUASS, American Urological Symptom Score; EPIC, Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; NYUPLOS, New York University Prospective Longitudinal Outcomes Study; RP, radical prostatectomy.