Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 11;1(5):221–226. doi: 10.1002/open.201200032

Table 1.

Optimization and regioselectivity for difluoromethylation of β-ketoester 1 a[a]

Inline graphic

Entry 2 c [equiv] Base (equiv)[b] Solvent T [°C] Yield [%][c] Ratio 3 a/4 a[d]
1 2.0 P1-tBu (1.5) CH3CN RT 43 53:47
2 2.0 P1-tBu (1.5) CH2Cl2 RT 43 53:47
3 2.0 TMG (1.5) CH3CN RT 34 47:53
4 2.0 DBU (1.5) CH3CN RT 21 53:47
5 2.0 Et3N (1.5) CH2Cl2 RT trace
6 2.0 Pyridine (1.5) CH2Cl2 RT trace
7 2.0 CH2Cl2 RT 0
8 2.0 P1-tBu (0.1) CH2Cl2 RT 12 58:42
9 2.0 P1-tBu (1.05) CH2Cl2 RT 30 50:50
10 3.0 P1-tBu (1.5) CH2Cl2 RT 47 55:45
11 3.0 P1-tBu (2.5) CH2Cl2 RT 47 55:45
12 3.0 P1-tBu (1.5) CH2Cl2 −78 52 69:31
13 3.0 P1-tBu (2.5) CH2Cl2 −78 68 69:31
[a]

Reagents and conditions: A solution of 1 a and base, which had been stirred in solvent for 15 min, was added to in situ generated 2 c in CH2Cl2. The mixture was stirred at above given temperature for a further 2–3 h.

[b]

P1-tBu=tert-butylimino-tris(dimethylamino)phosphorane, TMG=tetramethylguanidine, DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene.

[c]

Based on 1 a and determined by 19F NMR using PhCF3 as the internal standard.

[d]

Determined by 19F NMR of the crude products.