Table 1.
Description of included studies
Study |
Setting |
TD model structure and source | Screening uptake source | Baseline chlamydia prevalence source | Proportion asymptomatic |
Duration of infection |
Risk of transmission (baseline) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No symptoms | Symptoms | |||||||
Adams et al. 2007 [14] |
Comparison of screening strategies, UK |
Individual based, Turner et al.
[24] |
Studies of opportunistic screening, England |
Systematic review and UK survey data |
95.5% women; 100% men |
180 days not seeking treatment |
30 days seeking treatment |
0.0375 per act |
Andersen et al. 2006 [15] |
Home sampling screening with partner notification, Denmark |
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al.
[4,48] |
RCT of home sampling, Aarhus |
Danish surveillance system and observational study in Aarhus |
70% women; 50% men |
370 days in women; 200 days in men |
40 days in women; 33 days in men |
0.11 per act |
de Vries et al. 2006 [17] |
One off screening, the Netherlands |
Compartmental, original model |
Pilot of one off screening, the Netherlands |
Pilot of one off screening, the Netherlands |
70% women; 50% men |
1 year |
1 month |
0.68 assume per partnership |
de Vries et al. 2008 [16] |
Repeat systematic screening, the Netherlands |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
As above |
Gillespie et al. 2012 [18] |
Opportunistic screening, Ireland |
Individual based, Turner et al.
[24] |
Pilot of opportunistic screening, Ireland |
UK data |
95.5% women; 100% men |
180 days |
30 days |
0.0375 per act |
Low et al. 2007 [5] |
Active screening, UK |
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al.
[4,48] |
ClaSS cross sectional study of screening uptake |
ClaSS project |
70% women; 25% men |
200 days |
40 days in women; 33 days in men |
0.122 per act female to male; 0.154 per act male to female |
Roberts et al. 2007 [19] |
Register based screening, England |
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al. and Low et al.
[4,5,48] |
ClaSS cross sectional study of screening uptake |
ClaSS project |
70% women; 25% men |
200 days |
40 days in women; 33 days in men |
0.061 per day female to male; |
|
0.077 per day male to female |
|||||||
Townshend and Turner 2000 [21] |
Three different screening strategies, UK |
Compartmental, original model |
Not presented |
Sample of women presenting for cervical smear, UK |
75% women; 50% men |
2-3 years |
Not presented |
Not presented |
Tuite et al. 2012 [20] |
Screening, Canada |
Compartmental, Fisman et al.
[23] |
Testing patterns from Ontario Public Health Laboratory |
Annual notifiable disease data, Canada |
90% women; 92% men |
1 year untreated |
Not presented |
Present per partnership transmission probability* partner change rate |
Welte et al. 2000 [22] |
GP based opportunistic screening, Netherlands |
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al.
[4,48] |
GP pilot study, Amsterdam |
GP pilot study, Amsterdam |
70% women; 50% men |
Not presented |
Not presented |
0.10 per act |
Welte et al. 2005 [6] | As above | As above | As above | As above | Not stated, assume as above | 370 days in women; 200 days in men | 40 days in women; 33 days in men | 0.11 per act |