Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 30;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-11-8

Table 1.

Description of included studies

Study
Setting
TD model structure and source Screening uptake source Baseline chlamydia prevalence source Proportion asymptomatic Duration of infection
Risk of transmission (baseline)
    No symptoms Symptoms
Adams et al. 2007 [14]
Comparison of screening strategies, UK
Individual based, Turner et al. [24]
Studies of opportunistic screening, England
Systematic review and UK survey data
95.5% women; 100% men
180 days not seeking treatment
30 days seeking treatment
0.0375 per act
Andersen et al. 2006 [15]
Home sampling screening with partner notification, Denmark
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al. [4,48]
RCT of home sampling, Aarhus
Danish surveillance system and observational study in Aarhus
70% women; 50% men
370 days in women; 200 days in men
40 days in women; 33 days in men
0.11 per act
de Vries et al. 2006 [17]
One off screening, the Netherlands
Compartmental, original model
Pilot of one off screening, the Netherlands
Pilot of one off screening, the Netherlands
70% women; 50% men
1 year
1 month
0.68 assume per partnership
de Vries et al. 2008 [16]
Repeat systematic screening, the Netherlands
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
Gillespie et al. 2012 [18]
Opportunistic screening, Ireland
Individual based, Turner et al. [24]
Pilot of opportunistic screening, Ireland
UK data
95.5% women; 100% men
180 days
30 days
0.0375 per act
Low et al. 2007 [5]
Active screening, UK
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al. [4,48]
ClaSS cross sectional study of screening uptake
ClaSS project
70% women; 25% men
200 days
40 days in women; 33 days in men
0.122 per act female to male; 0.154 per act male to female
Roberts et al. 2007 [19]
Register based screening, England
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al. and Low et al. [4,5,48]
ClaSS cross sectional study of screening uptake
ClaSS project
70% women; 25% men
200 days
40 days in women; 33 days in men
0.061 per day female to male;
 
0.077 per day male to female
Townshend and Turner 2000 [21]
Three different screening strategies, UK
Compartmental, original model
Not presented
Sample of women presenting for cervical smear, UK
75% women; 50% men
2-3 years
Not presented
Not presented
Tuite et al. 2012 [20]
Screening, Canada
Compartmental, Fisman et al. [23]
Testing patterns from Ontario Public Health Laboratory
Annual notifiable disease data, Canada
90% women; 92% men
1 year untreated
Not presented
Present per partnership transmission probability* partner change rate
Welte et al. 2000 [22]
GP based opportunistic screening, Netherlands
Individual based, Kretzschmar et al. [4,48]
GP pilot study, Amsterdam
GP pilot study, Amsterdam
70% women; 50% men
Not presented
Not presented
0.10 per act
Welte et al. 2005 [6] As above As above As above As above Not stated, assume as above 370 days in women; 200 days in men 40 days in women; 33 days in men 0.11 per act