Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 10;14:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-20

Table 1.

Analysis results from the MIST2 dataset

  tPA vs placebo (n = 98) DNase vs placebo (n = 94) tPA+DNase vs placebo (n = 98)
Unadjusted for centre-effects
 
 
 
  Patients included – no. (%)
98 (100)
94 (100)
98 (100)
  Odds ratio (95% CI)
0.42 (0.09 to 1.87)
2.72 (0.88 to 8.42)
0.23 (0.04 to 1.29)
  P-value
0.25
0.08
0.10
Fixed-effects
 
 
 
  Patients included – no. (%)
66 (67)
80 (85)
81 (83)
  Odds ratio (95% CI)
0.54 (0.12 to 2.56)
3.34 (1.01 to 11.00)
0.24 (0.04 to 1.36)
  P-value
0.44
0.048
0.11
Random-effects
 
 
 
  Patients included – no. (%)
98 (100)
94 (100)
98 (100)
  Odds ratio (95% CI)
0.42 (0.09 to 1.87)
2.72 (0.88 to 8.42)
0.23 (0.04 to 1.29)
  P-value
0.25
0.08
0.10
GEE*
 
 
 
  Patients included – no. (%)
98 (100)
94 (100)
98 (100)
  Odds ratio (95% CI)
0.33 (0.06 to 1.75)
2.57 (0.76 to 8.66)
0.18 (0.03 to 1.19)
  P-value
0.19
0.13
0.08
Mantel-Haenszel
 
 
 
  Patients included – no. (%)
30 (31)
45 (48)
35 (36)
  Odds ratio (95% CI)
0.34 (0.05 to 2.15)
3.59 (0.99 to 13.03)
0.21 (0.02 to 1.98)
  P-value 0.27 0.04 0.13

*Convergence was not achieved.