Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep 18;21(1):86–92. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3257-2

Table 3.

Rate of positive margins on first excision and total volume excised to achieve negative margins: a comparison of Perpendicular and Cavity Shave methods, by T stage and presence of EIC.

Smaller extent of disease
Larger extent of disease
Perpendicular Cavity-Shave p-value Perpendicular Cavity-Shave p-value
Rate of positive margins on first excision
T1 (≤2cm) 13% 12% 0.69 T2/3 (>2cm) 27% 14% 0.20
No EIC 14% 11% 0.50 EIC 19% 15% 0.67
T1 and no EIC 13% 11% 0.56 T2/T3 or EIC 23% 15% 0.34

Median total volume excised to achieve negative margins (ml)
T1 (≤2cm) 47ml 61ml 0.03 T2/3 (>2cm) 95ml 69ml 0.47
No EIC 48ml 63ml 0.02 EIC 86ml 55ml 0.34
T1 and no EIC 45ml 63ml 0.01 T2/T3 or EIC 86ml 61ml 0.14

T stage, American Joint Commission on Cancer tumor stage; EIC, extensive intraductal component

Note: p-values derived from linear regression models using natural logarithm of total volume to negative margins.