Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 13;10(2):e1003466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003466

Figure 5. Reproduction of sign- versus goal-tracking tendencies in a population of rats undergoing an autoshaping experiment.

Figure 5

Mean probabilities to engage at least once with the lever (A,C) or the magazine (B,D) during trials. Data are expressed as mean Inline graphic S.E.M. and illustrated in 50-trial (2-session) blocks. (A,B) Reproduction of Flagel et al. [21] experimental results (Figure 2 A,B). Sign-trackers (ST) made the most lever presses (black), goal-trackers (GT) made the least lever presses (white), Intermediate group (IG) is in between (grey). (C,D) Simulation of the same procedure (squares) with the model. Simulated groups of rats are defined as STs (Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; n = 14) in red, GTs (Inline graphic ; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; n = 14) in blue and IGs (Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; Inline graphic; n = 14) in white. The model reproduces the same behavioural tendencies. With training, STs tend to engage more and more with the lever and less with the magazine, while GTs neglect the lever to increasingly engage with the magazine. IGs are in between.