Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 13;8(2):e2670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002670

Table 1. Infection and dissemination rates of rRVF-wt and rRVF-ΔNSm in Aedes aegypti determined by immunofluorescence assay on sagittal sections of mosquitoes.

rRVF-wt rRVF-ΔNSm
Day Infection Rate Dissemination Rates Infection Rate Dissemination Rates
# pos/# exposed # pos/# infected # pos / # exposed # pos/# infected
(n) # pos % pos (n) # pos % pos (n) # pos % pos (n) # pos % pos (n) # pos % pos (n) # pos % pos
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
1 11 7 64 11 0 0 7 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0
2 11 7 64 11 0 0 7 0 0 10 8 80 10 0 0 8 0 0
3 12 12 100 12 1 8 12 1 8 8 3 38 8 1 13 3 1 33
4 12 10 83 12 0 0 10 0 0 11 3 27 11 1 9 3 1 33
6 12 8 67 12 4 33 8 4 50 8 4 50 8 0 0 4 0 0
8 12 9 75 12 5 42 9 5 56 8 5 63 8 0 0 5 0 0
10 7 7 100 7 7 100 7 7 100 8 6 75 8 0 0 6 0 0
12 7 7 100 7 7 100 7 7 100 4 2 50 4 1 25 2 1 50
14 10 10 100 10 10 100 10 10 100 9 7 78 9 0 0 7 0 0

Mosquitoes on day 0 were harvested immediately after receiving an infectious blood meal and were not considered infected at the time of observation since no viral antigen was visible in the midgut epithelial cells.