Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dis Esophagus. 2013 Aug 13;27(7):662–669. doi: 10.1111/dote.12123

Table 2.

Cancer specific and overall survival comparing different treatment strategies in all patients

Cancer specific survival Overall survival

PS-adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value PS-adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value

Overall Unimodal (ref. group) vs. bimodal therapy 0.67 (0.60–0.74) <0.001 0.57 (0.52–0.62) <0.001

Surgery only (ref. group) vs. EBRT only 1.19 (1.05–1.35) 0.008 1.25 (1.11–1.41) <0.001
 Surgery only vs. EBRT only, first 7 months 0.85 (0.70–1.03) 0.09 0.70 (0.58–0.85) <0.001
 Surgery only vs. EBRT only, 8 to 60 months 1.33 (1.13–1.56) <0.001 1.47 (1.27–1.71) <0.001

Preoperative (ref. group) vs. postoperative EBRT 1.03 (0.87–1.22) 0.74 1.14 (0.97–1.33) 0.10

Estimations for CSS were performed using competing-risks regression model while for OS, cox proportional hazard models were performed. For the calculation of the propensity score (PS), the following covariates were used: gender, age (≤65 years, >65 years), race, ethnicity, marital status, tumor grade, tumor location, tumor T-stage, histology, and year (5 consecutive groups). vs.=versus, EBRT = External beam radiotherapy, ref.=reference, HR=Hazard ratio, CI=95% confidence interval