Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):388–406. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0204-4

Table 3. Effects of Isolation Rearing on Activity in the Between-Sessions Probabilistic Reversal-Learning Task.

Isolates and socials did not differ significantly in terms of mean target latency, but there was a trend towards longer non-target latencies in isolates (p = 0.098). Premature responding rates were lower in isolates than in socials, but there were no differences in % reward-perseverative responses, % punished-perseverative responses, or % timeout responses

socially reared isolation-reared
target latency (s) 6.49 ± 2.14 11.18 ± 2.53
non-target latency (s) 7.00 ± 2.18 17.69 ± 6.00
reward latency (s) 1.17 ± 0.06 1.43 ± 0.27
% premature responses 5.90% ± 0.82% 3.40% ± 0.72% *
% reward-perseverative responses 2.07% ± 0.20% 1.76% ± 0.19%
% punished-perseverative responses 12.11% ± 1.06% 11.32% ± 1.07%
% timeout responses 22.60% ± 1.86% 20.94% ± 2.34%

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*p < 0.05) denote significant differences compared to socials