Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2013 Apr 23;119(15):2778–2788. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28097

Table 2.

Univariate Analysis of Factors Associated with Disease-free Survival.

Characteristic No. of Patients 3-year DFS, % 5-year DFS, % P Value HR 95% CI
Sex
 Male 88 34 30 .82 1.04 .72 – 1.50
 Female 83 32 27
Age
 <60 years 88 32 30 .68 .92 .64 – 1.34
 ≥60 years 83 34 26
Synchronous CLM
 Yes 106 37 30 .56 .92 .63 – 1.34
 No 65 26 26
Primary tumor site
 Colon 123 31 30 .71 .93 .64 – 1.35
 Rectum 48 36 27
Primary tumor lymph node status
 Positive 99 30 26 .25 1.24 .85 – 1.81
 Negative 72 37 32
Chemotherapy
 Irinotecan 60 25 21 .088 1.39 .95 – 2.02
 Oxaliplatin 111 37 33
Bevacizumab
 Yes 75 37 35 .38 .85 .59 – 1.23
 No 96 29 24
Months of chemotherapy
 ≤3 85 39 35 .056 1.43 .99 – 2.07
 >3 86 28 21
CEA level ≥5 ng/mLΩ
 Yes 73 21 17 .005 1.69 1.17 – 2.44
 No 70 44 38
No. of CLM
 <3 111 35 30 .09 1.46 .94 – 2.26
 ≥3 60 30 25
Diameter of largest CLM ≥3 cm
 Yes 82 29 25 .17 1.28 .89 – 1.85
 No 89 37 31
Pathologic response
 Complete 14 77 77
 Major 84 32 31 .001 6.81 2.13– 21.8
 Minor 73 26 18 .049 4.69 1.47 – 15
Tumor thickness at TNI
 <0.5 35 58 58
 ≥0.5 mm and <5 mm 97 31 24 <.001§ 4.54 2.41 – 8.45
 ≥5 mm mm 39 15 11 .003** 2.39 1.34 – 4.27
Positive margin
 No 163 35 30
 Yes 8 0 0 .003 2.86 1.37 – 5.94

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; HR, hazard ratio; TNI, tumor–normal tissue interface.

Patients with complete vs major vs minor response.

Patients with major vs minor response.

§

Patients with TNI thickness <0.5 mm vs ≥0.5 mm and <5 mm vs ≥5 mm.

**

Patients with TNI thickness ≥0.5 mm and <5 mm vs ≥5 mm.

Ω

Missing data for 28 patients.